Objectives: We report on our surgical findings and outcome of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) in patients who have had three-piece inflatable penile implants. Methods: We looked at the retrospective data of 6 patients who have undergone RRP for cancer of the prostate after a prior insertion of a three-piece inflatable penile implant. We looked at the data involving operating time, blood loss, infection of the penile implant, damage to the penile implant, surgical margins of the prostate, damage to other pelvic structures, length of hospital stay, time interval between penile implant and RRP, technique of placing of the reservoir during the penile implant surgery. Results: The RRP procedures all went well, with no injury to the preexisting penile implants. There was also no compromise in the surgery for the cancer treatment, or injury to other pelvic organs. Conclusions: With increasing treatment of men with erectile dysfunction and also with increasing early diagnosis of cancer of the prostate, we are going to be seeing increasing numbers of patients who have had inflatable penile implants who subsequently need RRP for treatment of cancer of the prostate. We feel the surgery can be accomplished without any complication to the implant or compromise to the cancer surgery or injury to other pelvic organs.

Keywords:
Inflatable penile implant, Radical retropubic prostatectomy
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel
2005
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.