Objective: To investigate patients’ opinions on the degree of pain during shock wave lithotripsy, and the need for analgesics in patients with urinary stone. Methods: A prospective questionnaire study involving subjective pain assessment during and just after shock wave lithotripsy was performed in consecutive patients with uncomplicated renal or ureteral stones. The patients were given unbiased information on the analgesics prior to the procedure. Ten minutes after beginning shock wave lithotripsy, the degree of pain was rated by the patient using a 10-point visual analog scale. After the procedure, the patients were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire. Based on the response for the questionnaire, the patients were divided as ‘tolerable’ or ‘non-tolerable’ group. Results: The results from 180 patients (males 113, females 67) with a mean age of 50.0 ± 13.0 were analyzed. The average subjective pain score was 6.6 ± 2.3 during the procedure, and 70 (38.9%) patients responded that they were able to tolerate the pain without analgesics. A total of 116 (64.4%) patients did not agree that analgesic should be recommended to other patients. Subjective pain score during the procedures was not affected by laterality, size of stone, level of education or socioeconomic status, but was affected by patient age (p = 0.042), sex (p = 0.012) and location of stone (p = 0.014). Right and kidney stones were significantly higher in the ‘non-tolerable’ group than in the ‘tolerable’ group (p = 0.003 and p = 0.011, respectively), and the ‘non-tolerable’ patient group had a significant higher pain score than the ‘tolerable’ group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our result shows that subjective pain severity during shock wave lithotripsy is high but may be well tolerated in some patients. Our findings raise the question as to whether routine analgesics are required during newer generation shock wave lithotripsy procedures in all patients with a urinary stone.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.