Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine whether there are quantitative variations in the numbers of mast cells (MCs) in bladder carcinoma tissue associated with the histopathological grading of tumours. Materials and Methods: Specimens of 56 bladder carcinomas were stained with toluidine blue and histologically staged using the Mostofi system. The MC counts were assessed within tumour tissue and lamina propria of the bladder. The MCs in the adjacent ‘normal bladder tissue’ of 14 specimens from patients who underwent cystectomy and of 10 specimens from patients having interstitial cystitis were also determined. The results were analyzed by using the Student t test, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and the Spearman correlation (rs). Results: The mean MC concentration was 0.57 within the tumour tissue and 3.36 in the lamina propria. The difference between the two MC groups was statistically significant (p < 0.0001); there were no correlations between mean MC counts in tumour tissue and histopathological tumour grade and between mean MC counts in lamina propria and histopathological tumour grade. Statistically significant differences were also observed between tumour group and interstitial cystitis group (p = 0.029) and between tumour group and normal ‘adjacent’ tissue group (p = 0.037). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that MCs aggregate in small numbers in the lamina propria of bladder carcinomas and that the MC count is related to tumour differentiation. The number of MCs may be a useful prognostic indicator in patients with bladder carcinoma.

Keywords:
Bladder cancer, Mast cells, Histopathological grade, bladder cancer, Distribution, mast cells
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
2004
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.