Introduction: To investigate the prognostic importance of the changes in serum p53 antibody titrations during follow-up of patients who had anti-p53 antibody-positive invasive bladder tumors with transitional epithelial cells. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 23 clinically T3≤, N0, M0 patients with positive serum anti-p53 antibodies before treatment. 23 cases with negative serum anti-p53 antibodies who were comparable in age, comorbidity and stage with the study group were selected as a control group. The cases whose serum anti-p53 titrations decreased to normal levels after treatment were compared for metastases, death rates and survival with cases who remained serum anti-p53-positive and those who were serum p53 antibody-negative before treatment. Serum anti-p53 antibody titration was determined by ELISA. Results: While serum anti-p53 antibody titrations became negative in 8 (35%) of the 23 seropositive patients, it did not change in 15 patients (65%). There was a correlation between the maintenance of seropositivity, local progression/metastasis and death (p < 0.05). Survival was found to be better in cases who were seronegative after treatment compared with cases who remained positive and also those who were seronegative before treatment (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The normalization of serum anti-p53 antibody positivity after treatment of invasive bladder tumors seems to be a good and reliable prognostic indicator.

Keywords:
p53, Anti-p53 antibody, Bladder cancer, treatment, follow-up, ELISA
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
2004
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.