Objectives: Subclinical prostatitis is a very frequent histologic finding in pathological examinations of prostate biopsy and prostate surgery material. In this study, we tried to investigate the correlation between the morphological parameters of histological prostatitis and total serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-PSA density (PSAD) to determine if either the extent or aggressiveness of inflammation might affect serum PSA. Methods: 269 patients who had undergone TURP or transvesical prostatectomy with pathological diagnosis of BPH and prostatitis were included in the study. We retrospectively reviewed and scored the extent and aggressiveness of inflammation in prostate specimens of BPH, according to the scale that has been reported by Irani et al. and then correlated those scores with PSA and PSAD. Results: When the inflammation grades correlated with PSA and PSAD, the extent of the inflammation did not show a significant correlation with total PSA and PSAD (p > 0.05). However, there was a statistically significant correlation between aggressiveness grades and total PSA and PSAD (p < 0.001). Median PSA levels in grades 0, 1 and 2 of aggressiveness of inflammation were 3.2, 4.2 and 5.8 respectively. Conclusion: Aggressiveness grade of the inflammation in subclinical prostatitis is the most important morphological factor that is responsible for PSA elevation. We believe that it should be a more accurate guide for the clinician if pathologists report on the aggressiveness grades of the inflammation, especially on initial prostate biopsies, in order to help for timing of the further biopsy.

Keywords:
Subclinical prostatitis, Inflammation, Prostate-specific antigen
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
2003
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.