Introduction: Visual laser ablation of the prostate (VLAP) has a clinical failure rate of up to 18% which is 3 times higher than transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) alone. Prolonged spontaneous passage of necrotic debris is the major shortcoming of this method. Therefore combined visual laser-assisted and transurethral prostatectomy was compared to TURP alone. Materials and Methods: 105 patients were evaluated in a prospective randomized study comparing TURP alone and VLAP combined with TURP. The patients were evaluated 1, 3 and 12 months after surgery. First VLAP was performed using a neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser with the prolase fiber followed by standard resection of the necrotic and remaining prostatic tissue. Treatment efficacy was assessed by the American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score, measurements of peak urinary flow, residual urine volume, intraoperative bleeding, and by the occurrence of intra- and postoperative complications. Results: The use of VLAP and consecutive TURP improved the AUA symptom score, urinary flow and residual volume and was comparable in all patients treated. Intraoperative bleeding was significantly reduced from 522 ± 45 ml by TURP to 214 ± 33 ml by VLAP+TURP (p < 0.05). There was a significant improvement in the postoperative values of the parameters observed in both groups. Conclusions: It appears that the combined method for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia reduced the specific intraoperative morbidity of TURP while achieving the same clinical effect as TURP alone.

Keywords:
Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Transurethral prostatectomy, Visual laser-assisted prostatectomy
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
2003
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.