Introduction: Micrometastasis before radical prostatectomy (RP) is considered to be related to the biochemical failure after surgery in patients with prostate cancer. To predict the biochemical failure, we evaluated microvascular (lymphatic/vascular) invasion and other pathological findings as prognostic factors for biochemical failure after RP. Materials and Methods: Eighty-two men who underwent RPs and received neither preoperative nor postoperative adjuvant therapy were analyzed. Pathological findings of each patient were carefully reviewed to determine pathological factors predicting biochemical failure. The influence of pathological findings on the biochemical failure was evaluated. Results: The overall biochemically assessed disease-free survival rate was 55.7% at 3 years. By univariate analysis, Gleason sum, capsular penetration, and microvascular invasion were significantly associated with the rate of biochemical failure. Microvascular invasion was strongly correlated with Gleason sum, capsular penetration, surgical margin, perineural invasion, and pathological stage. By multivariate analysis, Gleason sum, capsular penetration, and microvascular invasion were independent predictors of biochemical failure. Conclusion: This study suggests that in addition to Gleason grade and capsular penetration, microvascular invasion is one of independent prognostic factors in patients with prostate cancer treated with RPs.

Keywords:
Prostate cancer, Radical prostatectomy, Biochemical failure, Microvascular invasion
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
2003
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.