Introduction: To investigate whether ordinary tests used in urolithiasis can increase the diagnostic value of unenhanced helical computed tomography (HCT). Materials and Methods: Of all patients admitted with acute flank pain, 137 without radiocontrast allergy, pregnancy and renal insufficiency were included in the study. After urinalysis (Ur) and ultrasonography (USG), HCT without a contrast agent was taken by 5-mm collimation, thereafter excretory urography (EU) was obtained. Confirmation of a stone was done by various tests and/or treatment methods. Statistically, the predictive values of HCT, USG, EU and Ur and their combinations were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROC). Results: The patients’ mean age was 38 (range 4–72) years. Sensitivity values of HCT, USG, EU and Ur were 97, 69, 71 and 81%, respectively. Their specificity values were 96, 87, 91 and 65%, respectively. The widest AROC was found for HCT (97%). The best test combination was [HCT or USG] according to the AROC value (93%), but none of the AROC values of the test combinations was higher than that of HCT. However, 95% confidence intervals of the AROC values of these tests and their combinations overlapped. Conclusions: Because the HCT combinations with other tests improved the diagnostic value of HCT, they should be preferred in some individuals suspected of having urolithiasis. However, the most feasible single test meeting the all usage purposes was HCT in terms of the AROC value, and the combination was [HCT or USG] in which either HCT or USG was positive.

Keywords:
Unenhanced helical computed tomography, Ultrasonography, Excretory urography, Urinalysis, Urolithiasis
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
2003
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.