Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether the quality of life (QOL) in patients who underwent orthotopic bladder replacement after radical cystectomy was affected by the intestinal segment used for the creation of a neobladder. Materials and Methods: A total of 52 patients who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer were included in this study; i.e., 24 patients with an ileal neobladder and 28 patients with a sigmoid neobladder. QOL was evaluated using the SF-36 health-related QOL survey and a questionnaire designed to evaluate the continent status. Results: The mean follow-up periods for patients with an ileal and a sigmoid neobladder was 40.2 and 43.1 months, respectively. The SF-36 survey revealed that patients with colon neobladder had a significantly higher score for role-emotional functioning than those with ileal neobladder, while there was no significant difference in the remaining seven scores between patients with ileal and colon neobladders; however, general health and social functioning in patients with both types of neobladder appeared to be significantly lower than those in the general population in the United States. The results of the questionnaire analyzing the continent status were also similar between these two groups, including the desire to urinate, the incidence of both day- and nighttime urinary leakage, the frequency of pad exchange, and the concern of urine odor. Conclusions: Six of the eight scales concerning health-related QOL were favorable with both patients with ileal and colon neobladders, and the health-related QOL in orthotopic neobladder patients except for role-emotional functioning was not affected by the segment of the intestine used for neobladder construction. Moreover, no significant differences were observed in the QOL associated with continent status between these two groups. Therefore, patients with both types of orthotopic neobladder were generally satisfied with their health-related as well as disease-specific QOL.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.