Objectives: To analyze the pathophysiology of persistent lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients after transurethral prostatectomy (TURP). Methods: A total of 185 patients who had persistent LUTS after TURP were enrolled into this study. All of these patients underwent multichannel videourodynamic studies and were classified into 6 groups according to the urodynamic results. Preoperative prostate volume, resected adenoma weight, and preoperative Qmax were determined in each of the groups and the symptomatology and urodynamic findings were compared. Results: A normal videourodynamic tracing was found in 17 patients (9.1%), pure detrusor instability in 18 (9.6%), low detrusor contractility in 35 (18.7%), detrusor instability and inadequate detrusor contractility (DHIC) in 27 (14.4%), poor relaxation of the urethral sphincter in 36 (19.3%), and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in 52 (27.8%). Incontinence was noted in 74 patients (40%), and 18 of them had BOO (24.3%). In urodynamic findings, Qmax and residual urine showed no significant difference among patients with low contractility, poor relaxation of sphincter, DHIC and BOO. Concerning the preoperative prostatic volume, patients with low contractility, poor relaxation of urethral sphincter, and DHIC had a nonsignificantly smaller prostate volume and resected prostate weight than other groups. Preoperative Qmax showed no significant difference among all groups. Conclusions: Symptoms alone are unreliable in predicting urodynamic findings with respect to obstruction and detrusor instability after TURP. Over half of the patients with persistent LUTS had a small prostate volume and small resected adenoma weight, indicating that some of these patients may not have had BOO. Videourodynamic study is helpful in making an accurate diagnosis for refractory LUTS after TURP.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.