Purpose: In this prospective study we try to evaluate the necessity of performing additional transitional zone biopsies as part of the standard sextant biopsies procedure in order to detect prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: During a 12-month period we performed biopsies in 420 patients. All patients had two additional biopsies of the transitional zone biopsies. 289 of them were biopsies for the first time because they had an elevated PSA and/or a suspicious DRE. One hundred and thirty-one had a repeat biopsy because of the remaining elevated PSA after the previous negative one. Results: Of the 420 patients 143 (34%) had cancer, with 11 (7%) having cancer in the transitional zone only. Patients initially evaluated because of high PSA and or a positive DRE had only 2 (2.1%) cancers exclusively in the transitional zone. We found that this percentage rises (18.7%) when the patients had already at least one previous negative biopsy of the peripheral zone, and during the repeat biopsy the transitional zone is samples. Conclusions: The low yield of transitional zone biopsies (2.1%) during first time sampling of the prostate does not warrant their systematic use for the early detection of prostate cancer. Instead the effectiveness of biopsies in that area is higher when the biopsy is repeated after an initial previous negative biopsy of the peripheral zone.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.