Introduction: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) has long been accepted worldwide in the treatment of kidney stone disease. Upper ureter calculi in ureteral and kidney malformations are rather frequent (10–25%). The aims of this retrospective study were to determine whether malformations might impair fragment expulsion. Material and Methods: From 1986 to 1995, 203 patients with ureteral and kidney malformations were treated and followed up for a minimum of 1 year to a maximum of 9 years. Malformations included: ureteropelvic junction stenosis, horseshoe kidney, renal malrotation, renal ectopia, duplicated ureter, nonobstructive megaureter, medullary sponge kidney and caliceal diverticula. As pretreatment workup, all patients underwent conventional studies prior to SWL treatment: X-rays, renal ultrasound, intravenous pyelography, routine blood tests and urinalysis. All examinations were repeated at regular intervals for the first 6 months. Patients with metabolic disorders were excluded from the study. We also excluded patients with a follow-up of under 1 year. We considered three groups of patients: (1) stone-free patients at plain X-rays and ultrasound; (2) >90% elimination, i.e. stone-free patients at plain X-rays and positive at ultrasound; (3) patients with residual fragments at plain X-rays and ultrasound. Results: 96 (55%) patients were in group 1 (stone free), 40 (19%) were in group 2 (>90% elimination) and 67 (26%) were in group 3 (residual). Residual stones were more frequent in patients with medullary sponge kidney (82%). In patients with renal ectopia the residual stone rate accounted for only 13% of cases. Conclusions: There is evidence that SWL should always be offered to patients with ureteral and kidney malformations. These patients should however be considered at high risk for recurrences and so they need to be carefully followed up.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.