Introduction: Italy delayed limiting access to the Faculty of Medicine and the reform of schools of specialization was not accompanied by programming the number of scholarships, so employment expectations are often disappointing. The aim of this study is to analyze the employment prospects of specialists in urology through the development of possible scenarios for the 5-year period 2000–2004. Materials and Methods: We recorded data received from Italian Schools of Specialization in Urology on specialists in the 5-year period 1994–1998. We also tried to obtain a picture of the national distribution of urologists and urological units. Statistical processing was done with SPSS for Windows 5.0. Results: In the last 5 years, 501 urologists were licensed at an average age of 37 years; 535 urological units exist; 2,332 doctors practice urology (2,235 males and 97 females) for a ratio of 1 urologist to 24,500 inhabitants. By comparing the ‘entrance’ forecast with the potential ‘exit’, we can hypothesize an annual excess of 80 units. There is no significant correlation between the number of urologists in each structure and the number of inhabitants for each urologist. Conclusions: The present government programme does not take into account continual changes in employment and many other variables when defining the actual need for specialists. For valid predictions, the data we obtain must be updated for at least 5 years.

Keywords:
Urological manpower, Urological unemployment, School of specialization in urology, Urological employment, Italian urological map
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
2000
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.