Objectives: To compare the performance of laparoscopic skill assisted by a traditional two-dimensional (2D) and a three-dimensional (3D) endoscopic video system in a pelvic trainer. Materials and Methods: The 3D imaging system (DeepVision®, Automated Medical Products Corp.) consists of a traditional single lens optic laparoscope, a light source, an endoscopic camera (Stryker), a DeepVision processor and a DeepVision monitor. The 2D images could be obtained with the same system without turning on the DeepVision processor. Thirty-four medical personnel with no laparoscopic surgical experience were enrolled to perform two skill tests, the object-pick-up and spatial orientation test in a trainer box. They were randomly divided into two groups, one group performed the test under 2D conditions first and 3D later, and another group performed the test under 3D conditions first and 2D later. The duration needed to complete the skill tests was recorded and the differences on performance time under 2D and 3D conditions were calculated for each participant. Two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the statistic difference on the performance time in two conditions. Results: The duration needed to complete the initial skill tests was similar among 2D and 3D conditions. For both tests, the average performance time decreased significantly for the second attempt regardless of 2D or 3D conditions. Statistic analysis disclosed significant difference for learning factor (p < 0.001 for object-pick-up test and p < 0.01 for spatial orientation test), but no significant difference betwen 2D and 3D conditions (p = 0.276 for object-pick-up test and p = 0.327 for spatial orientation test). Conclusion: A significant decrease of the performance time at the second attempt reflected the importance of a learning process in laparoscopic surgery. It appears that no significant benefits were obtained by this 3D operating system for surgeons without laparoscopic surgical experience.

Keywords:
Task performance and analysis, Laparoscopy, Image processing, Computer assisted
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
2000
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.