Objective: To assess the pathophysiology of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in aged men without bladder outlet obstruction in a videourodynamic study. Methods: In a videourodynamic study of 324 consecutive men with moderate to severe LUTS suggestive for bladder outlet obstruction, 112 were found to be urodynamically nonobstructed. International prostatic symptom score (IPSS), uroflowmetry and transrectal sonography of the prostate were assessed before videourodynamic study. The pressure flow expression and the obstructive parameters were compared between the 212 obstructed and 112 nonobstructed men. Results: Of the 112 nonobstructed men investigated, 25 had a normal bladder and urethral trace (22.3%), 5 had detrusor instability (4.5%), 17 had a hypersensitive bladder and a normal urethra (15.2%), 3 had detrusor underactivity and a normal urethra (2.7%), while 61 were found to have a poorly relaxed external sphincter and low detrusor contractility (54.5%). Most of the patients in the normal and hypersensitive groups had normal voiding pressure and high flow (NPHF) tracings, whereas men with detrusor underactivity or a poorly relaxed external sphincter had normal voiding pressure and low flow (NPLF) tracings. Only the maximal flow rate and voided volume were significantly higher in patients with NPHF than in patients with NPLF tracings. However, both groups showed a significantly lower IPSS, less residual urine, and a smaller transition zone index than the obstructive group. After medical treatment, 78 patients (69.6%) had satisfactorily improved, 31 patients (27.6%) remained stationary, while 3 (2.7%) worsened. Conclusion: Nonobstructed men with LUTS have various pathophysiologies other than benign prostatic obstruction. In this study 54.5% of these patients had poorly relaxed external sphincter on videourodynamic study. Identification of the underlying pathology can not only prevent unnecessary prostate surgery but can also enable proper medical treatment to be selected.

Keywords:
Lower urinary tract symptoms, Aged men, Bladder outlet obstruction
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
2000
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.