Purpose: To study the efficacy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and skeletal alkaline phosphatase (SAP) as staging markers in discriminating patients with cancer of the prostate (CaP) with (M+) and without bone metastases (M0). Material and Methods: 73 patients with untreated CaP entered the study. After staging the patients were divided into 3 groups: group I, patients with CaP and bone metastases (n = 21); group II, patients with locally advanced CaP without bone metastases (n = 26), and group III, patients with clinically localized CaP without bone metastases (n = 26). Results: None of the M0 patients but 71% of the M+ patients exhibited an increased SAP. A corresponding cutoff point of 100 ng/ml for PSA showed that 19% of M0 patients and 71% of the M+ patients exhibited a value of >100 ng/ml. This resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 71 and 100% of SAP and 71 and 81% for PSA, respectively. Conclusion: SAP could become a useful marker in the evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed CaP as it provides additional information concerning the skeletal status of these patients.

Keywords:
Skeletal alkaline phosphatase, Prostate-specific antigen, Prostate cancer staging, Bone metastases
This content is only available via PDF.
1998
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.