Objectives: To date, chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma has been associated with only moderate therapeutic success and minimal extension of survival. This, coupled with the occurrence of serious side effects and the resulting reduced quality of life, underscores the need for new chemothera-peutic agents. A first study investigating combination therapy with etoposide and ifosfamide reported not only comparable therapeutic effectiveness but, due primarily to the elimination of the cisplatin component, a reduction in nephrotoxic side effects. In the present study, therefore, patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma and minor compromised renal function received combination chemotherapy with etoposide and ifosfamide. Methods: Fourteen patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma underwent chemotherapy with a combination of etoposide and ifosfamide. On days 1–5, patients received 1,500 mg/m2 ifosfamide and 120 mg/m2 etoposide. The next corresponding cycle was started on day 22. Results: A number of serious side effects were observed. These consisted predominantly of high-grade myelo-suppression requiring therapy, as well as disturbances in the central nervous system and impairment of renal function. Due to severe side effects, chemotherapy had to be prematurely terminated in 8 of 14 patients (57%). The efficacy of therapy, however, was observed in patients completing the treatment regimen. Conclusions: The new combined chemotherapy with etoposide and ifosfamide shows efficacy in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. This, however, is overshadowed by the high rate of serious side effects leading to premature interruption of therapy.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.