In a retrospective study we analyzed patients undergoing open stone removal in the Department of Urology of the University of Tübingen. In 2.7% of all urinary calculi, open stone surgery was necessary. Open operation was performed on all patients with complete staghorn calculi as well as on patients with renal pelvic stones and simultaneous morphological obstruction. Partial staghorn calculi were operated on only after endoscopic treatment had failed. Small renal pelvic stones and ureteral stones were surgically removed only after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and endoscopic surgery had been unsuccessful. The treatment of choice for ureteral calculi is ESWL. If ESWL is impossible, an endoscopic approach is advisable. Open operations of ureteral calculi only have to be performed if endoscopic therapy has failed or if there is a simultaneous morphological obstruction. Meta-analysis of publications from 1981 to 1995 confirmed our approach regarding indications for open stone removal. Comparison of the results reported in the literature is very difficult because of the missing, but generally accepted definition of stone free. In addition different examination techniques to determine the status Ê»stone free’ make it difficult to compare the various studies.

Keywords:
Urolithiasis, Staghorn calculus, Ureteral stones, Open stone removal, Stone free
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1997 S. Karger AG, Basel
1997
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.