Objectives: The purpose of this study is to report the rate of early complications in 316 of 600 patients who underwent anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized prostatic cancer from June 1988 to July 1996 and to measure the effect of increasing experience in a single institution. Methods: From January 1992 to August 1995, 316 patients with prostatic cancer underwent anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy at our medical institution. Early complications were recorded prospectively and the rate of complications of the first 166 patients was compared with the rate in the next 150 patients. Results: Comparison of the 2 groups showed a significant decrease in blood loss with time (mean 1,397 vs. 967 cm3, p = 0.0011). The rates of anastomotic urinary leakage (21.7 vs. 10%, p = 0.0056), lymphoceles (22.3 vs. 2%, p < 0.0001), rectal injury (7.8 vs. 2%, p = 0.02), reoperation (10.2 vs. 4%, p = 0.049), and thromboembolic complications (7.8 vs. 2.7%, p = 0.0479) also decreased significantly. Only ureteral transsection showed an increase in the later group (0 vs. 4.7%, p = 0.005). Conclusions: The low percentage of early complications suggests that anatomical retropubic radical prostatectomy is a safe approach. Our single-center study showed a learning pattern that appears unavoidable when this operation is as radical as possible so as to keep the percentage of positive margins low especially in patients with advanced tumors ( > pT2).

Keywords:
Prostatic carcinoma, Prostatectomy, Complications, prostatectomy
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1997 S. Karger AG, Basel
1997
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.