Sections from 104 cases of benign, preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions of the prostate were studied for argyrophilic nucleolar organizer regions (AgNORs). The mean NOR counts in normal controls (2.87) and benign prostatic hyperplasia with or without chronic prostatitis (4.90 and 3.84 NORs/nucleus, respectively) were found to be significantly less (p < 0.001) than that in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and adenocarcinoma of the prostate (5.65 and 5.78 NORs/nucleus, respectively). The mean AgNOR count of a section with atypical adenomatous hyperplasia was significantly lower than that in PIN. No statistically significant difference was observed between AgNOR counts of high-grade PIN and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (WDAC; 5.67 vs. 5.78 NORs/nucleus, respectively), however the difference between low-grade PIN and WDAC was statistically significant (5.46 vs. 5.78 NORs/ nucleus, p < 0.005). The increase in NOR counts occurred concomitantly with the decrease in the degree of differentiation of adenocarcinoma. Thus, NOR was found to be a good adjuvant to the existing diagnostic parameters to pick up more cases at the stage of PIN when prognosis is better.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.