To elucidate whether a significant difference in malignant potential between ureteropelvic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) and bladder TCC is present, the argyrophilic nucleolar organizer region (AgNOR), nuclear DNA content and mean nuclear area (MNA) were evaluated in 32 ureteropelvic TCCs and 60 bladder TCCs, and were also compared with histological grade and stage. The parameters used were the mean AgNOR count (C-AgNOR), the percentage of cells exhibiting more than 3 AgNOR dots within nuclei (P-AgNOR), 2c deviation index (2cDI), 5c exceeding rate (5cER) and MNA. No significant difference in these 5 parameters was found between ureteropelvic and bladder TCCs. In addition, within each histological grade of tumor, no significant difference in each parameter between ureteropelvic and bladder TCCs was noted. Similarly, within pTa or pT1 TCCs, there was no significant difference in the parameters between ureteropelvic and bladder TCCs. On the other hand, invasive TCCs (pT2 and higher), the C-AgNOR and P-AgNOR were significantly higher in ureteropelvic than in bladder TCC (p < 0.05), while no significant difference in 2cDI, 5cER and MNA was noted. These findings suggest that: (i) as a whole, the difference in malignant potential between ureteropelvic and bladder TCCs appears to be less significant, and (ii) factors other than the malignant potential of a tumor might contribute to the unfavorable clinical outcome in patients with ureteropelvic TCC.

Keywords:
Urothelial tumor, 2c deviation index, 5c exceeding rate, Argyrophilic nucleolar organizer region, Image analyzer
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1996 S. Karger AG, Basel
1996
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.