A rare case of multiple urological anomalies is presented. The chief complaint of the patient, a 12-year-old girl, was urinary incontinence. Radiologic and endoscopic examinations revealed that the patient had a normal left kidney and ureter, a left ectopic blind-ending ureter that opened near the neck of the bladder, and right complete double ureters with an ectopic orifice that opened on the left of the external urethral meatus. This orifice was responsible for her urinary incontinence. Right ureteroneocystostomy was performed and the incontinence was cured. An attempt was made to explain the embryological origin of the anomalies observed in this case. We postulated that during development, on the left, there were three ureteral buds on the mesonephric duct. The first bud was at the normal position and drained the left kidney in a normal manner. The second bud was cranial from the normal position on the mesonephric duct and was associated with growth in an abnormal direction. This bud made contact with the upper portion of the right metanephric mass. The last bud grew between the two aforementioned buds. This bud was not draped by the metanephric mass and became the blind-ending ureter. On the right, one ureteral bud was located on the mesonephric duct and it made contact with a metanephric mass that became the right kidney. The upper part of the right kidney was drained by the ureter that had originally been located on the left mesonephric duct. This condition should be termed crossed ureteral ectopia rather than crossed renal ectopia, since the ureter was the structure that crossed.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.