The introduction of monoclonal antibodies into the diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) has been a further step toward the use of biological parameters to support conventional cytological diagnosis of this tumor entity. Several investigators have demonstrated the high sensitivity and good specificity of immunocytology. Nevertheless this technique is hampered by the inconvenient and time-consuming microscopic analysis. The purpose of this study was to combine the advantages of immunocytology with the capabilities of an automated flow-cytometric system. Since all monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) currently used for immunocytology cross-react with granulocytes a preselection of urothelial cells becomes necessary for immuno-flow cytometry (immuno-FCM). Based on earlier analyses mAb Due AUT 2, reactive against urothelium and not against granulocytes, was chosen to preselect for urothelial cells. mAb Due ABC 3 was used to discriminate between normal and malignant urothelial cells. Initial experiments including 10 barbotage specimens from patients with histologically proven TCC and concomitant urinary tract infection yielded a high sensitivity (90%) of immuno-FCM. In 10 control patients with malignancies other than bladder TCC and benign diseases ABC 3 expression was not increased. Flow-cytometric examination of irrigation specimens from 10 patients with a history of bladder cancer but without cys-toscopic and cytologic evidence of tumor recurrence showed abnormal results in 6 patients. Rebiopsy and/or cystectomy confirmed tumor recurrence in 5 of these patients and in 1 patient with negative immuno-FCM. Ongoing prospective trials will further define the clinical impact of this approach in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with bladder cancer.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.