Burch colposuspension is a very popular operation for the correction of genuine stress incontinence, due to its very good long-term results. The effect of the operation on the urodynamic parameters at the level of the bladder neck evaluated in this study, and correlated with clinical outcome. A total of 29 female patients with urinary stress incontinence who underwent a Burch colposuspension were clinically and urodynamically studied pre- and postoperatively. The urodynamic parameters chosen pre- and post-operatively were: maximum flow rate, residual urine, first sensation, bladder capacity, maximum detrusor pressure, detrusor pressure at maximum flow, functional urethral length and maximum closure pressure. Complete cure was obtained in 76% of the patients and improvement in 14%, the overall success rate being 90% for a mean follow-up of 18.4 months (range 8–27). Comparison of the pre- and postoperative urodynamic data revealed that the maximum urine flow rate, functional urethral length, maximum urethral closure pressure and residual urine were changed significantly after the operation. There were no statistical differences in the other parameters. All the urodynamic results that improved, however, only arrived at the lower limits of the values accepted as standard for normal individuals. This fact, however, did not prevent a good clinical result.

Keywords:
Female incontinence, Burch colposuspension, Urodynamic studies
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1994 S. Karger AG, Basel
1994
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.