In order to assess the clinical implications of the cytology of voided urine, we analyzed 65 patients among 147 cases of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) in relation to the cytohistologic correlation and prognostic significance. Urinary cytology detected 42.6% of bladder tumors, 59% of renal pelvic tumors, and 35.3% of ureteral carcinomas. None of the 3 cases of grade-1 upper urinary tract tumors was detected by preoperative urinary cytology. Tumors with positive cytology were associated with epidermal growth factor receptor expression (p = 0.0009) and a higher fraction of tumor proliferation as defined by Ki-67 immunohistochemistry (p = 0.0038). Anaplastic tumor cells in urine correlated fairly well with muscular invasion (p = 0.018) and the DNA aneu-ploidy of the tumor (p = 0.0038). Tumors with muscular invasion were more likely to be detected by cytologic examination (p = 0.013). In urinary bladder carcinoma (n = 107), patients with positive cytology had a higher incidence of tumor recurrence (p = 0.004), and had an unfavorable prognosis (p = 0.0001) with a median follow-up of 46 months. In Ta-T1 tumors (n = 87), urinary cytology had prognostic value in terms of risk of recurrence (p = 0.0001), and poor patient outcome (p = 0.0001). Our data suggest that urinary cytology can offer important biological information on TCC and may be used as a simple and effective short-term prognostic indicator.

Keywords:
Urinary cytology, Transitional cell carcinoma, Epidermal growth factor receptor, Ki-67 index, DNA ploidy
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1994 S. Karger AG, Basel
1994
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.