Renal damages after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic MRI in 37 patients with renal stone by spin echo methods (T1 and T2-weighted scan) and small tip angle gradient echo method (T2-weighted scan). Sixty-eight percent of the patients had changes in the MRI findings after ESWL. The frequently observed findings were perirenal fluid collection (38%), loss of corticomedullary junction (35%), and increased signal intensity of muscle and other adjacent tissue (34%). Preoperative Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic MRI showed low intensity band which suggests Gd-DTPA secretion from the glomerulus into the renal tubulus. In all cases the low intensity band became unclear after ESWL because of renal contusion due to ESWL. MRI, including Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic MRI, is considered to be a good procedure for evaluation of renal damages due to ESWL.

Keywords:
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, Magnetic resonance imaging, Gd-DTPA
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1992 S. Karger AG, Basel
1992
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.