In 55 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis or ureter, the ploidy, the DNA heterogeneity and the counts of cell cycle phases in the tumor were examined by means of single-cell DNA cytophotometry in order to find more prognostic factors than those already known (stage and grade). Follow-up periods ranged from 1 to 6 years. At the time of first diagnosis, 42 (76%) of the patients had tumors of the renal pelvis, 13 (24%) of them had ureteral tumors. 23 (42%) patients were in stage pT 1 N 0, 15 (27%) in stage pT 2 N 0, 12 (22%) in stage pT 3 N 0, and 5 (9%) were in stage pT 3 N +. The histological malignancy grade most frequently seen in the patients examined – i.e. in 51% of cases – was malignancy grade II. 25% of the patients had grade III tumors whereas only 24% had grade I tumors. With malignancy grade I, DNA cytophotometry showed DNA frequency peaks to be in the diploid range while tumors with malignancy grade II showed heterogenous DNA patterns. 71% of the patients with malignancy grade III showed aneuploid DNA values; 29% of them had polyploid DNA values. For malignancy grades II and III, the proliferation rate of the tumor cells was statistically significantly higher than for malignancy grade I. The determination of tumor heterogeneity and tumor cell proliferation by means of DNA cytophotometry gives valuable clues regarding prognosis.

Keywords:
Urothelial carcinoma, Renal pelvis, DNA, Ploidy
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1991 S. Karger AG, Basel
1991
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.