One hundred and sixty-one evaluable patients with biopsy-confirmed transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder were studied in a cooperative protocol comparing intravesical BCG and adriamycin. Patients have been followed for 2–25 months (median 15.7 months) with cystoscopy at 3-month intervals, urinary cytology, and bladder biopsy. Sixteen of 88 patients (19%) who received BCG immunotherapy developed tumor recurrence compared with 45 recurrences (54%) in the 83 patients who received adriamycin chemotherapy (p < 0.001, Χ2). Eighty-nine of the randomized patients had documented carcinoma in situ. The complete response rate in 41 patients with carcinoma in situ who received BCG was 85%, compared with a complete response rate of only 39% in 46 patients who received adriamycin (p < 0.001 Χ2). These data suggest that BCG immunotherapy is superior to adriamycin chemotherapy in the prevention of recurrent superficial transitional cell carcinoma and the treatment of in situ carcinoma of the urinary bladder.

Keywords:
Bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy, Adriamycin, intravesical, Cancer, superficial bladder
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1986 S. Karger AG, Basel
1986
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.