Abstract
It is reported on the accuracy of the cytological examination of freshly voided urine of 247 patients with 318 urothelial bladder tumors, and the results are compared with the evaluation of bladder washing cytology in 82 patients with 105 bladder tumors. If voided urine is used for examination, there is no evidence in tumors with 0 and 1 grade of malignancy, whereas the bladder washing cytology of grade I tumors shows a correlation for the histological findings in 26.3%. In tumors with malignant grades GII and GIII, the bladder washing cytology shows a significantly higher accuracy (81.4%) than in examination of voided urine (67.2%). In both methods the accuracy of cytology rises with infiltration and differentiation grades of the tumor.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1983 S. Karger AG, Basel
1983
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.