A urethral/bladder model was placed in a reservoir simulating the abdominal cavity. Increased ‘intraabdominaΓ pressure was transmitted to the urethra-like part of the model only when this was situated inside the ‘abdominal cavity’. The use of H2O or CO2 as filling medium was indifferent as only the relation between rise in urethral pressure and in bladder pressure is of practical importance. However, the increase in transmitted pressure was 25% lower when CO2 was used. Incompetent urethral closure mechanism is found in three categories of female patients: (1) patients with sensory urge who have an unstable urethra, (2) patients with genuine stress incontinence, and (3) patients who have a sphincteric insufficiency due to a low maximal urethral closure pressure and atrophy of the urethral mucosa. These categories can be separated urodynamically using simultaneous urethracystometry combined with transmission studies. Out of 20 patients with sensory urge 16 were found to have an unstable urethra. Transmission studies in 51 women with symptoms of stress incontinence revealed positive transmission, i.e. the increase in urethral pressure exceeded the rise in bladder pressure, in 23 patients. They were all elderly women and had a low maximal urethral closure pressure and their leakage of urine was due to an endourethral weakness. The remaining 28 patients had negative transmission and thus genuine stress incontinence. In conclusion: To classify the three different types of incompetent urethral closure mechanism it is necessary to perform a simultaneous urethracystometry, in which transmission studies are mandatory, as this is the most appropriate way to distinguish between patients who will benefit from operation and patients who will not.

Keywords:
Urethra/bladder model, Transmission studies, Stress incontinence, Sensory urge, Incompetent urethral closure mechanism, Simultaneous urethracystometry
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1982 S. Karger AG, Basel
1982
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.