Contradictory data from the literature along with our own experience using functional electrical stimulation (FES) have facilitated the determination of objective criteria for the application of FES in correcting urinary incontinence. Simultaneous urodynamic, neurophysiological, and radiological examinations employed during our studies enabled us to determine changes in these parameters due to FES. Among a large number of patients with urinary incontinence (for example: paraplegics, patients with spina bifida, stress incontinence following prostate operations, or resistant enuresis) we have determined that FES is appropriate if applied to properly selected patients. FES is indicated on the basis of the following criteria: the degree of morphological lesion of the urinary tract, the peripheral denervation of the muscles of the pelvic floor, the condition of the spinal center for miction, and, above all the quality of response to FES. FES not only activates the closing muscles of the bladder, but also inhibits the reflex contractions of the detrusor. Here, it should be noted that FES is indicated for cases of reflex incontinence. During FES of the pelvic floor muscles intravesical pressure normally diminishes and the reflex contractions of the detrusor subside. Sometimes, however, the reflex of miction occurs. In such a case, two reflex mechanisms are engaged. Their equilibrium, i.e. controlled miction, can be achieved with an afferent in flow which inhibits the reflex of miction. The use of FES for the correction of urinary incontinence can be a very good method if the FES parameters are individually chosen and patients properly selected.

Keywords:
Urinary incontinence, Electrical stimulation
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1976 S. Karger AG, Basel
1976
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.