Abstract
Introduction: The aim of the study was to provide data related to endoscopic combined intra-renal surgery learning curve using minimally invasive techniques with vacuum-assisted devices. Minimal data exist on the learning curve for these techniques. Methods: We conducted a prospective study monitoring the training of a mentored surgeon learning ECIRS with vacuum assistance. We use varied parameters for improvements. After collection of peri-operative data, tendency lines and CUSUM analysis were used to investigate the learning curves. Results: 111 patients have been included. Guy’s Stone Score 3 and 4 stones 51.3% of all cases. The mostly used percutaneous sheath was 16 Fr (87.3%). SFR was 78.4%. 52.3% patients were tubeless, and 38.7% achieved trifecta. High-degree complication rate was 3.6%. Operative time improved after 72 cases. We observed a decrease of complications throughout the case series, with improvement after 17 cases. In terms of trifecta, proficiency was reached after 53 cases. Proficiency seems achievable in a limited number of procedures, but results did not plateau. Higher number of cases might be necessary for excellence. Discussion: A surgeon learning ECIRS with vacuum assistance can obtain proficiency in 17–50 cases. The number of procedures required for excellence remains unclear. Exclusion of more complex cases might positively affect the training, reducing unnecessary complications.
References
1.
Bryniarski
P
, Paradysz
A
, Zyczkowski
M
, Kupilas
A
, Nowakowski
K
, Bogacki
R
. A randomized controlled study to analyze the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones more than 2 cm in diameter
. J Endourol
. 2012
;26
(1
):52
–7
.2.
Yamaguchi
A
, Skolarikos
A
, Buchholz
NPN
, Chomon
GB
, Grasso
M
, Saba
P
, . Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison of tract dilation methods in 5, 537 patients in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study
. J Endourol
. 2011
;25
(6
):933
–9
.3.
Knoll
T
, Wezel
F
, Michel
MS
, Honeck
P
, Wendt-Nordahl
G
. Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study
. J Endourol
. 2010
;24
(7
):1075
–9
.4.
Jackman
SV
, Hedican
SP
, Peters
CA
, Docimo
SG
. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool age children: experience with a new technique
. Urology
. 1998
;52
(4
):697
–701
.5.
Zeng
G
, Cai
C
, Duan
X
, Xu
X
, Mao
H
, Li
X
, . Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a noninferior modality to standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of 20-40mm renal calculi: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
. Eur Urol
. 2021
;79
(1
):114
–21
.6.
Li
X
, He
Z
, Wu
K
, Li
SK
, Zeng
G
, Yuan
J
, . Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the Guangzhou experience
. J Endourol
. 2009
;23
(10
):1693
–7
.7.
Zeng
G
, Wan
S
, Zhao
Z
, Zhu
J
, Tuerxun
A
, Song
C
, . Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP): a new concept in technique and instrumentation
. BJU Int
. 2016
;117
(4
):655
–61
.8.
Tokas
T
, Skolarikos
A
, Herrmann
TRW
, Nagele
U
; Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology TRUST-Group
. Pressure matters 2: intrarenal pressure ranges during upper-tract endourological procedures
. World J Urol
. 2019
;37
(1
):133
–42
.9.
Ibarluzea
G
, Scoffone
CM
, Cracco
CM
, Poggio
M
, Porpiglia
F
, Terrone
C
, . Supine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access
. BJU Int
. 2007
;100
(1
):233
–6
.10.
Scoffone
CM
, Cracco
CM
, Cossu
M
, Grande
S
, Poggio
M
, Scarpa
RM
. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy
. Eur Urol
. 2008
;54
(6
):1393
–403
.11.
Tiselius
HG
, Andersson
A
. Stone burden in an average Swedish population of stone formers requiring active stone removal: how can the stone size be estimated in the clinical routine
. Eur Urol
. 2003
;43
(3
):275
–81
.12.
Thomas
K
, Smith
NC
, Hegarty
N
, Glass
JM
. The Guy’s stone score--grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures
. Urology
. 2011
;78
(2
):277
–81
.13.
Okhunov
Z
, Friedlander
JI
, George
AK
, Duty
BD
, Moreira
DM
, Srinivasan
AK
, . S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi
. Urology
. 2013
;81
(6
):1154
–9
.14.
Mazzon
G
, Choong
S
, Pavan
N
, Zeng
G
, Wu
W
, Durutovic
O
, . Introducing Trifecta for percutaneous nephrolithotomies: a proposal for standard reporting outcomes after treatment for renal stones
. Minerva Urol Nephrol
. 2022
;74
(3
):351
–9
.15.
de la Rosette
JJ
, Opondo
D
, Daels
FP
, Giusti
G
, Serrano
A
, Kandasami
SV
, . Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy
. Eur Urol
. 2012
;62
(2
):246
–55
.16.
Choong
S
, de la Rosette
J
, Denstedt
J
, Zeng
G
, Sarica
K
, Mazzon
G
, . Classification and standardized reporting of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) consensus statements
. Minerva Urol Nefrol
. 2021
;74
(1
):110
–8
.17.
Lim
TO
, Soraya
A
, Ding
LM
, Morad
Z
. Assessing doctors’ competence: application of CUSUM technique in monitoring doctors’ performance
. Int J Qual Health Care
. 2002
;14
(3
):251
–8
.18.
Cho
SY
, Choo
MS
, Jung
JH
, Jeong
CW
, Oh
S
, Lee
SB
, . Cumulative sum analysis for experiences of a single-session retrograde intrarenal stone surgery and analysis of predictors for stone-free status
. PLoS One
. 2014
;9
(1
):e84878
.19.
Chung
KJ
, Kim
JH
, Min
GE
, Park
HK
, Li
S
, Del Giudice
F
, . Changing trends in the treatment of nephrolithiasis in the real world
. J Endourol
. 2019
;33
(3
):248
–53
. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0667.20.
Ahmad
AA
, Alhunaidi
O
, Aziz
M
, Omar
M
, Al-Kandari
AM
, El-Nahas
A
, . Current trends in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an internet-based survey
. Ther Adv Urol
. 2017
;9
(9–10
):219
–26
.21.
Cracco
CM
, Scoffone
CM
. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) - tips and tricks to improve outcomes: a systematic review
. Turk J Urol
. 2020
;46
(Suppl 1
):S46
–57
.22.
Turk
C
, Petřík
A
, Sarica
K
, Seitz
C
, Skolarikos
A
, Straub
M
. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for Urolithiasis
. Eur Urol
. 2016
;69
(3
):475
–82
.23.
Zeng
G
, Zhang
T
, Agrawal
M
, He
X
, Zhang
W
, Xiao
K
, . Super-Mini Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial
. BJU Int
. 2018
;122
(6
):1034
–40
.24.
Pillai
SB
, Chawla
A
, de la Rosette
J
, Laguna
P
, Guddeti
R
, Reddy
SJ
, . Super-Mini Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) in the management of renal calculi ≤ 2 cm: a propensity matched study
. World J Urol
. 2022
;40
:553
–62
.25.
Guddeti
RS
, Hegde
P
, Chawla
A
, de la Rosette
JJMCH
, Laguna Pes
MP
, Kapadia
A
. Super-mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus standard PCNL for the management of renal calculi of <2 cm: a randomised controlled study
. BJU Int
. 2020
;126
(2
):273
–9
.26.
Zhong
W
, Wen
J
, Peng
L
, Zeng
G
. Enhanced Super-Mini-PCNL (eSMP): low renal pelvic pressure and high stone removal efficiency in a prospective randomized controlled trial
. World J Urol
. 2021
;39
(3
):929
–34
.27.
Zanetti
SP
, Lievore
E
, Fontana
M
, Turetti
M
, Gallioli
A
, Longo
F
, . Vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a new perspective in fragments clearance and intrarenal pressure control
. World J Urol
. 2021
;39
(6
):1717
–23
.28.
Tanriverdi
O
, Boylu
U
, Kendirci
M
, Kadihasanoglu
M
, Horasanli
K
, Miroglu
C
. The learning curve in the training of percutaneous nephrolithotomy
. Eur Urol
. 2007
;52
(1
):206
–11
.29.
Jang
WS
, Choi
KH
, Yang
SC
, Han
WK
. The learning curve for flank percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a single surgeon’s experience
. Korean J Urol
. 2011
;52
(4
):284
–8
.30.
Schilling
D
, Gakis
G
, Walcher
U
, Stenzl
A
, Nagele
U
. The learning curve in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: a 1-year retrospective evaluation of a novice and an expert
. World J Urol
. 2011
;29
(6
):749
–53
.© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2023
You do not currently have access to this content.
