Introduction: The aim of the study was to investigate the value of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and lesion diameter (LD) combination in prostate cancer (PCa) detection. Methods: 181 patients who were detected to have prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) 3 lesions in mpMRI and underwent prostate biopsies were included in the study. Demographic, clinical, and pathological data of all patients were evaluated. The patients were divided into four groups according to PSAD and LD status (PSAD <0.15 ng/mL/cc + LD <1 cm, PSAD <0.15 ng/mL/cc + LD ≥1 cm, PSAD ≥0.15 ng/mL/cc + LD <1 cm, and PSAD ≥0.15 ng/mL/cc + LD ≥1 cm). Diagnostic ability for PCa and clinical significant PCa (csPCa) was evaluated by PSAD and LD. Results: PSAD ≥0.15 ng/mL/cc (OR = 6; 95% Cl = 2.847–12.647; p < 0.001), LD ≥1 cm (OR = 7.341; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.91–18.52; p < 0.001), and combination of PSAD ≥0.15 ng/mL/cc and LD ≥1 cm (OR = 10.023; 95% CI = 4.32–23.252; p < 0.001) were associated with PCa detection rates. The most sensitivity, specificity, negative, and positive predictive values were found in PSAD ≥0.15 ng/mL/cc + LD ≥1 cm group for both PCa and csPCa detection (48.8%, 92%, 85.2%, and 65.6% for any PCa detection; 66.7%, 85.2%, 97.3%, and 24.2% for csPCa detection, respectively). Conclusion: The presence of PSAD ≥0.15 ng/mL/cc or LD ≥1 cm in mpMRI of patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions is associated significantly with the finding of PCa and particularly with the detection of csPCa.

1.
Culp
MB
,
Soerjomataram
I
,
Efstathiou
JA
,
Bray
F
,
Jemal
A
.
Recent global patterns in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates
.
Eur Urol
.
2020
;
77
(
1
):
38
52
.
2.
Stabile
A
,
Giganti
F
,
Rosenkrantz
AB
,
Taneja
SS
,
Villeirs
G
,
Gill
IS
.
Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis: current status and future directions
.
Nat Rev Urol
.
2020
;
17
(
1
):
41
61
.
3.
EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Milan
Arnhem, the Netherlands
EAU Guidelines Office
2023
.
4.
Wei
JT
,
Barocas
D
,
Carlsson
S
,
Coakley
F
,
Eggener
S
,
Etzioni
R
.
Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline Part II: considerations for a prostate biopsy
.
J Urol
.
2023
;
210
(
1
):
54
63
.
5.
Schoots
IG
,
Padhani
AR
.
Risk-adapted biopsy decision based on prostate magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density for enhanced biopsy avoidance in first prostate cancer diagnostic evaluation
.
BJU Int
.
2021
;
127
(
2
):
175
8
.
6.
Alberts
AR
,
Bokhorst
LP
,
Kweldam
CF
,
Schoots
IG
,
van der Kwast
TH
,
van Leenders
GJ
.
Biopsy undergrading in men with Gleason score 6 and fatal prostate cancer in the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Rotterdam
.
Int J Urol
.
2017
;
24
(
4
):
281
6
.
7.
Weinreb
JC
,
Barentsz
JO
,
Choyke
PL
,
Cornud
F
,
Haider
MA
,
Macura
KJ
.
PI-RADS prostate imaging–reporting and data system: 2015, version 2
.
Eur Urol
.
2016
;
69
(
1
):
16
40
.
8.
Kortenbach
KC
,
Løgager
V
,
Thomsen
HS
,
Boesen
L
.
Comparison of PSA density and lesion volume strategies for selecting men with equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions on bpMRI for biopsies
.
Abdom Radiol
.
2023
;
48
(
2
):
688
93
.
9.
Rico
L
,
Blas
L
,
Vitagliano
G
,
Contreras
P
,
Pita
HR
,
Ameri
C
PI-RADS 3 lesions: does the association of the lesion volume with the prostate-specific antigen density matter in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer? Urologic Oncology: seminars and Original Investigations
Elsevier
2021
.
10.
Alanee
S
,
Deebajah
M
,
Dabaja
A
,
Peabody
J
,
Menon
M
.
Utilizing lesion diameter and prostate specific antigen density to decide on magnetic resonance imaging guided confirmatory biopsy of prostate imaging reporting and data system score three lesions in African American prostate cancer patients managed with active surveillance
.
Int Urol Nephrol
.
2022
;
54
(
4
):
799
803
.
11.
Chen
M
,
Zhang
Q
,
Zhang
C
,
Zhao
X
,
Marra
G
,
Gao
J
.
Combination of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and multiparametric MRI improves the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a lesion-by-lesion analysis
.
J Nucl Med
.
2019
;
60
(
7
):
944
9
.
12.
Hectors
SJ
,
Chen
C
,
Chen
J
,
Wang
J
,
Gordon
S
,
Yu
M
.
Magnetic resonance imaging radiomics-based machine learning prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer in equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions
.
J Magn Reson Imaging
.
2021
;
54
(
5
):
1466
73
.
13.
Morote
J
,
Campistol
M
,
Triquell
M
,
Celma
A
,
Regis
L
,
de Torres
I
.
Improving the early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in men in the challenging prostate imaging-reporting and data system 3 category
.
Eur Urol Open Sci
.
2022
;
37
:
38
44
.
14.
Lee
CU
,
Lee
SM
,
Chung
JH
,
Kang
M
,
Sung
HH
,
Jeon
HG
.
Clinical utility of prostate Health index for diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions
.
Cancers
.
2022
;
14
(
17
):
4174
.
15.
Boschheidgen
M
,
Schimmöller
L
,
Doerfler
S
,
Al-Monajjed
R
,
Morawitz
J
,
Ziayee
F
.
Single center analysis of an advisable control interval for follow-up of patients with PI-RADS category 3 in multiparametric MRI of the prostate
.
Sci Rep
.
2022
;
12
(
1
):
6746
.
You do not currently have access to this content.