Background and Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate if the tumor heterogeneity index can predict the aggressiveness of prostate cancer (PCa) in patients diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion biopsy. Material and Methods: Patients who underwent MRI fusion prostatic biopsy between July 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Tumor heterogeneity index (coefficient of variation [CV]) and PI-RADS v2.1 scoring were analyzed by using multiparametric MRI. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the risk classification, and the correlation between tumor heterogeneity index and PCa aggressiveness was studied by using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmean and ADCcv), Gleason score (GS), and risk classifications. Results: One hundred two patients were included in this study. Patients were evaluated as low-risk (group 1) (n = 35), moderate-risk (group 2) (n = 37), and high-risk (group 3) (n = 30). ADCmean values for all groups were significantly different (p < 0.0001). ADCcv tumor heterogeneity index values were higher in group 2 and group 3 by the score increases in subgroups according to GS, while being higher than group 1 (p < 0.001). The multivariate analysis revealed that prostate-specific antigen, PI-RADS, ADCmean, and ADCcv values were predictive for tumor aggressiveness. Conclusion: ADCcv value as a tissue texture parameter can be used as a new biomarker to evaluate tumor aggressiveness in patients with PCa.

1.
Siegel
RL
,
Miller
KD
,
Jemal
A
.
Cancer statistics, 2019
.
CA Cancer J Clin
.
2019 Jan
;
69
(
1
):
7
34
.
2.
Loeb
S
,
Folkvaljon
Y
,
Robinson
D
,
Makarov
DV
,
Bratt
O
,
Garmo
H
,
Immediate versus delayed prostatectomy: Nationwide Population-Based Study (.)
.
Scand J Urol
.
2016 Aug
;
50
(
4
):
246
54
.
3.
Villers
A
,
Lemaitre
L
,
Haffner
J
,
Puech
P
.
Current status of MRI for the diagnosis, staging and prognosis of prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy and active surveillance
.
Curr Opin Urol
.
2009 May
;
19
(
3
):
274
82
. .
4.
Turkbey
B
,
Brown
AM
,
Sankineni
S
,
Wood
BJ
,
Pinto
PA
,
Choyke
PL
.
Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer
.
CA Cancer J Clin
.
2016 Jul
;
66
(
4
):
326
36
. .
5.
Ueno
Y
,
Tamada
T
,
Bist
V
,
Reinhold
C
,
Miyake
H
,
Tanaka
U
,
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: current role in prostate cancer management
.
Int J Urol
.
2016 Jul
;
23
(
7
):
550
7
.
6.
Turkbey
B
,
Rosenkrantz
AB
,
Haider
MA
,
Padhani
AR
,
Villeirs
G
,
Macura
KJ
,
Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2
.
Eur Urol
.
2019 Sep
;
76
(
3
):
340
51
.
7.
Verma
S
,
Rajesh
A
,
Morales
H
,
Lemen
L
,
Bills
G
,
Delworth
M
,
Assessment of aggressiveness of prostate cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with histologic grade after radical prostatectomy
.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
.
2011 Feb
;
196
(
2
):
374
81
.
8.
Woodfield
CA
,
Tung
GA
,
Grand
DJ
,
Pezzullo
JA
,
Machan
JT
,
Renzulli
JF
 2nd
.
Diffusion-weighted MRI of peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient with Gleason score and percentage of tumor on core biopsy
.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
.
2010 Apr
;
194
(
4
):
W316
22
. .
9.
Vargas
HA
,
Akin
O
,
Franiel
T
,
Mazaheri
Y
,
Zheng
J
,
Moskowitz
C
,
Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness
.
Radiology
.
2011 Jun
;
259
(
3
):
775
84
.
10.
Yoon
HJ
,
Kim
Y
,
Kim
BS
.
Intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity predicts invasive components in breast ductal carcinoma in situ
.
Eur Radiol
.
2015 Dec
;
25
(
12
):
3648
58
. .
11.
Bundschuh
RA
,
Dinges
J
,
Neumann
L
,
Seyfried
M
,
Zsótér
N
,
Papp
L
,
Textural parameters of tumor heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT for therapy response assessment and prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
.
J Nucl Med
.
2014 Jun
;
55
(
6
):
891
7
.
12.
Tyson
MD
,
Arora
SS
,
Scarpato
KR
,
Barocas
D
.
Magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer
.
Urol Oncol
.
2016 Jul
;
34
(
7
):
326
32
. .
13.
Salami
SS
,
Ben-Levi
E
,
Yaskiv
O
,
Ryniker
L
,
Turkbey
B
,
Kavoussi
LR
,
In patients with a previous negative prostate biopsy and a suspicious lesion on magnetic resonance imaging, is a 12-core biopsy still necessary in addition to a targeted biopsy?
BJU Int
.
2015 Apr
;
115
(
4
):
562
70
.
14.
Alessandrino
F
,
Taghipour
M
,
Hassanzadeh
E
,
Ziaei
A
,
Vangel
M
,
Fedorov
A
,
Predictive role of PI-RADSv2 and ADC parameters in differentiating Gleason pattern 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 prostate cancer
.
Abdom Radiol
.
2019
;
44
(
1
).
15.
Dola
EF
,
Nakhla
OL
,
Genidi
EA
.
Assessing the validity of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2) scoring system in diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer
.
Eur J Radiol Open
.
2017
;
4
:
19
. .
16.
Wu
X
,
Reinikainen
P
,
Vanhanen
A
,
Kapanen
M
,
Vierikko
T
,
Ryymin
P
,
Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient value on diffusion-weighted MR imaging and Gleason score in prostate cancer
.
Diagn Interv Imaging
.
2017
;
98
(
1
):
63
71
.
17.
Stein
D
,
Goldberg
N
,
Domachevsky
L
,
Bernstine
H
,
Nidam
M
,
Abadi-Korek
I
,
Quantitative biomarkers for liver metastases: comparison of MRI diffusion-weighted imaging heterogeneity index and fluorine-18-fluoro-deoxyglucose standardised uptake value in hybrid PET/MR
.
Clin Radiol
.
2018 Sep
;
73
(
9
):
832.e17
22
.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.