Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the tolerability of postoperative early intravesical chemotherapy session after transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TUR-B) according to the different anesthesia types. Methods: The study was conducted between February 2017 and June 2020. Patients who were given intravesical mitomycin (MMC) 40 mg after TUR-B were included. Patients’ risk categories (low, medium, and high) were determined according to the European Association of Urology (EAU) risk stratification system based on the tumor number, size (<3 and ≥3 cm), T stage (Ta and T1), and grade (low and high). Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the applied anesthesia technique as group S (spinal) and group G (general). The patients’ visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded every 30 min for 2 h after urethral clamping. The patients’ pain scores were recorded using the VAS questionnaire form at 30th (VAS1), 60th (VAS2), 90th (VAS3), and 120th (VAS4) min after the urethral clamping. Requirement of analgesic, urethral clamp removal time, total instillation time, and discharged urine volume were recorded. Complications and complication grade (1–5) were recorded according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Results: A total of 232 consecutive patients who received intravesical MMC were included. Sociodemographic characteristics of group S (n = 113) and group G (n = 119) were similar (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in tumor size, number of tumors, concomitant CIS, and T stage in both groups (p > 0.05). High-grade tumors were higher in group S (23.9 vs. 11%; p = 0.008). Requirement of analgesic (53.9 vs. 91.5%; p = 0.00) and termination of therapy <60′ (2 vs. 26%; p = 0.00) and <120′ (32.7 vs. 76.4%; p = 0.00) were significantly lower in group S. The mean instillation time (108.05 ± 19.40 vs. 85.67 ± 24.66 min; p = 0.00) was found significantly higher for group S. In group G, mean VAS1–4 scores were significantly higher than in group S (p < 0.05). Linear correlation analyses showed that the VAS score is correlated with the instillation time (p < 0.05). The rates of minor (I–III) (7 vs. 8%; p = 0.706) and major (IV–V) (0.9 vs. 1.6%; p = 0.590) complications were similar in both groups. Conclusion: The patients’ tolerability of intravesical MMC treatment can be improved by spinal anesthesia. It provides longer instillation time and less pain during intravesical chemotherapy.

1.
Ferlay
J
,
Colombet
M
,
Soerjomataram
I
,
Mathers
C
,
Parkin
DM
,
Piñeros
M
,
Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods
.
Int J Cancer
.
2019
;
144
(
8
):
1941
53
. .
2.
Compérat
E
,
Larré
S
,
Roupret
M
,
Neuzillet
Y
,
Pignot
G
,
Quintens
H
,
Clinicopathological characteristics of urothelial bladder cancer in patients less than 40 years old
.
Virchows Arch
.
2015
;
466
(
5
):
589
94
. .
3.
Sylvester
RJ
,
van der Meijden
AP
,
Oosterlinck
W
,
Witjes
JA
,
Bouffioux
C
,
Denis
L
,
Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials
.
Eur Urol
.
2006
;
49
(
3
):
466
7
; discussion 475–7. .
4.
Sylvester
RJ
,
Oosterlinck
W
,
van der Meijden
AP
.
A single immediate postoperative instillation of chemotherapy decreases the risk of recurrence in patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of published results of randomized clinical trials
.
J Urol
.
2004
;
171
(
6 Pt 1
):
2186
435
. .
5.
Pan
JS
,
Slocum
HK
,
Rustum
YM
,
Greco
WR
,
Gaeta
JF
,
Huben
RP
.
Inhibition of implantation of murine bladder tumor by thiotepa in cauterized bladder
.
J Urol
.
1989
;
142
(
6
):
1589
93
. .
6.
Sylvester
RJ
,
Oosterlinck
W
,
Holmang
S
,
Sydes
MR
,
Birtle
A
,
Gudjonsson
S
,
Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing a single immediate instillation of chemotherapy after transurethral resection with transurethral resection alone in patients with stage pTa-pT1 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: which patients benefit from the instillation?
Eur Urol
.
2016
;
69
(
2
):
231
44
. .
7.
Abern
MR
,
Owusu
RA
,
Anderson
MR
,
Rampersaud
EN
,
Inman
BA
.
Perioperative intravesical chemotherapy in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw
.
2013
;
11
(
4
):
477
84
. .
8.
Perlis
N
,
Zlotta
AR
,
Beyene
J
,
Finelli
A
,
Fleshner
NE
,
Kulkarni
GS
.
Immediate post-transurethral resection of bladder tumor intravesical chemotherapy prevents non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer recurrences: an updated meta-analysis on 2548 patients and quality-of-evidence review
.
Eur Urol
.
2013
;
64
(
3
):
421
30
. .
9.
Giesbers
AA
,
Van Helsdingen
PJ
,
Kramer
AE
.
Recurrence of superficial bladder carcinoma after intravesical instillation of mitomycin-C. Comparison of exposure times
.
Br J Urol
.
1989
;
63
(
2
):
176
9
. .
10.
Stoehr
B
,
Mueller
T
,
Granig
T
,
Zangerl
F
,
Steiner
H
.
Increasing patient comfort by optimized postoperative administration of intravesical mitomycin C
.
BJU Int
.
2008
;
102
(
11
):
1556
9
. .
11.
Tyritzis
SI
,
Stravodimos
KG
,
Vasileiou
I
,
Fotopoulou
G
,
Koritsiadis
G
,
Migdalis
V
,
Spinal versus general anaesthesia in postoperative pain management during transurethral procedures
.
ISRN Urol
.
2011
;
2011
:
895874
. .
12.
Sagen
E
,
Namnuan
RO
,
Hedelin
H
,
Nelzén
O
,
Peeker
R
.
The morbidity associated with a TURP procedure in routine clinical practice, as graded by the modified Clavien-Dindo system
.
Scand J Urol
.
2019
;
53
(
4
):
240
5
. .
13.
Kumar
SK
,
Callander
NS
,
Alsina
M
.
Clinical practice guidelines in oncology
.
J Natl Compr Cancer Netw
.
2017
;
15
:
230
69
.
14.
Lamm
DL
.
Bladder cancer
.
Semin Surg Oncol
.
2002
;
13
:
289
90
.
15.
Bosschieter
J
,
Nieuwenhuijzen
JA
,
van Ginkel
T
,
Vis
AN
,
Witte
B
,
Newling
D
,
Value of an immediate intravesical instillation of mitomycin C in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a prospective multicentre randomised study in 2243 patients
.
Eur Urol
.
2018
;
73
(
2
):
226
32
. .
16.
Babjuk
M
,
Burger
M
,
Compérat
EM
,
Gontero
P
,
Mostafid
AH
,
Palou
J
,
European association of urology guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (TaT1 and carcinoma in situ): 2019 update
.
Eur Urol
.
2019
;
76
(
5
):
639
57
. .
17.
Tien
M
,
Kou
A
,
Leppert
JT
,
Mariano
ER
,
Mudumbai
SC
.
Spinal anesthesia increases the rate of opioid-free recovery after transurethral urologic surgery
.
J Clin Anesth
.
2020
;
60
:
109
10
. .
18.
Maffezzini
M
,
Campodonico
F
,
Manuputty
EE
,
Puntoni
M
,
Martelli
A
,
Marini
V
,
Systemic absorption and pharmacokinetics of single-dose early intravesical mitomycin C after transurethral resection of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer
.
Urology
.
2013
;
82
(
2
):
400
4
. .
19.
Sun
Y
,
Li
T
,
Gan
TJ
.
The effects of perioperative regional anesthesia and analgesia on cancer recurrence and survival after oncology surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Reg Anesth Pain Med
.
2015 Sep–Oct
;
40
(
5
):
589
98
. .
20.
Chen
WK
,
Miao
CH
.
The effect of anesthetic technique on survival in human cancers: a metaanalysis of retrospective and prospective studies
.
PLoS One
.
2013
;
8
:
1e56540
.
21.
Cakmakkaya
OS
,
Kolodzie
K
,
Apfel
CC
,
Pace
NL
.
Anaesthetic techniques for risk of malignant tumour recurrence
.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
.
2014
;
7
:
CD008877
.
22.
Biki
B
,
Mascha
E
,
Moriarty
DC
,
Fitzpatrick
JM
,
Sessler
DI
,
Buggy
DJ
.
Anesthetic technique for radical prostatectomy surgery affects cancer recurrence: a retrospective analysis
.
Anesthesiology
.
2008
;
109
(
2
):
180
7
. .
23.
Koumpan
Y
,
Jaeger
M
,
Mizubuti
GB
,
Tanzola
R
,
Jain
K
,
Hosier
G
,
Spinal Anesthesia is Associated with Lower Recurrence Rates after Resection of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
.
J Urol
.
2018
;
199
(
4
):
940
6
. .
24.
Kim
R
.
Anesthetic technique and cancer recurrence in oncologic surgery: unraveling the puzzle
.
Cancer Metastasis Rev
.
2017
;
36
(
1
):
159
77
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.