Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT)-based primary staging in exclusively D′Amico intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Patients and Methods: We relied on the Braunschweig institutional database and retrospectively identified D′Amico intermediate-risk PCa patients who were administered to 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-based primary staging prior to consecutive radical prostatectomy and extended lymph node dissection. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the detection of lymph node metastases were analyzed per-patient (n = 39), per-pelvic side (n = 78), and per-anatomic-region (external iliac artery and vein left/right vs. obturator fossa left/right vs. internal iliac artery left/right) (n = 203), respectively. Results: Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV per-patient were 20.0, 94.1, 33.3, and 88.9%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV per-pelvic-side were 16.7, 97.2, 33.3, and 93.3%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV per-anatomic-region were 16.7, 99.0, 33.3, and 97.5%, respectively. Conclusions: We recorded high rates of specificity and NPV for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-based primary staging in D′Amico intermediate-risk PCa patients. Conversely, the sensitivity and PPV were lower than anticipated. Larger and favorably prospective trials are needed to verify our results and to unravel possible bias from such smaller studies.

1.
Perera
M
,
Papa
N
,
Roberts
M
,
Williams
M
,
Udovicich
C
,
Vela
I
,
Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer-updated diagnostic utility, sensitivity, specificity, and distribution of prostate-specific membrane antigen-avid lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Eur Urol
.
2020 Apr
;
77
(
4
):
403
17
.
2.
Mottet
N
,
Bellmunt
J
,
Bolla
M
,
Briers
E
,
Cumberbatch
MG
,
De Santis
M
,
Eau-estro-siog guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent
.
Eur Urol
.
2017
;
71
(
4
):
618
29
. .
3.
Esen
T
,
Kilic
M
,
Seymen
H
,
Acar
O
,
Demirkol
MO
.
Can Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT replace conventional imaging modalities for primary lymph node and bone staging of prostate cancer?
Eur Urol Focus
.
2020 Mar 15
;
6
(
2
):
218
20
.
4.
Roach
PJ
,
Francis
R
,
Emmett
L
,
Hsiao
E
,
Kneebone
A
,
Hruby
G
,
The impact of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT on management intent in prostate cancer: results of an australian prospective multicenter study
.
J Nucl Med
.
2018
;
59
(
1
):
82
8
.
5.
Schiffmann
J
,
Haese
A
,
Leyh-Bannurah
SR
,
Salomon
G
,
Steuber
T
,
Schlomm
T
,
Adherence of the indication to European association of urology guideline recommended pelvic lymph node dissection at a high-volume center: differences between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
.
Eur J Surg Oncol
.
2015
;
41
(
11
):
1547
53
. .
6.
Budaus
L
,
Leyh-Bannurah
SR
,
Salomon
G
,
Michl
U
,
Heinzer
H
,
Huland
H
,
Initial experience of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging in high-risk prostate cancer patients prior to radical prostatectomy
.
Eur Urol
.
2016
;
69
(
3
):
393
6
.
7.
Maurer
T
,
Gschwend
JE
,
Rauscher
I
,
Souvatzoglou
M
,
Haller
B
,
Weirich
G
,
Diagnostic efficacy of (68)Gallium-PSMA positron emission tomography compared to conventional imaging for lymph node staging of 130 consecutive patients with intermediate to high risk prostate cancer
.
J Urol
.
2016
;
195
(
5
):
1436
43
. .
8.
van Leeuwen
PJ
,
Emmett
L
,
Ho
B
,
Delprado
W
,
Ting
F
,
Nguyen
Q
,
Prospective evaluation of 68Gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in prostate cancer
.
BJU Int
.
2017
;
119
(
2
):
209
15
. .
9.
Herlemann
A
,
Wenter
V
,
Kretschmer
A
,
Thierfelder
KM
,
Bartenstein
P
,
Faber
C
,
(68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography provides accurate staging of lymph node regions prior to lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer
.
Eur Urol
.
2016
;
70
(
4
):
553
7
. .
10.
Zhang
Q
,
Zang
S
,
Zhang
C
,
Fu
Y
,
Lv
X
,
Deng
Y
,
Comparison of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT with mpMRI for preoperative lymph node staging in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer
.
J Transl Med
.
2017
;
15
(
1
):
230
.
11.
D'Amico
AV
,
Whittington
R
,
Malkowicz
SB
,
Schultz
D
,
Blank
K
,
Broderick
GA
,
Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
.
Jama
.
1998
;
280
(
11
):
969
74
. .
12.
Corfield
J
,
Perera
M
,
Bolton
D
,
Lawrentschuk
N
.
(68)Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) for primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review
.
World J Urol
.
2018
;
36
(
4
):
519
27
.
13.
Hofman
MS
,
Lawrentschuk
N
,
Francis
RJ
,
Tang
C
,
Vela
I
,
Thomas
P
,
Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study
.
Lancet
.
2020
;
395
(
10231
):
1208
16
. .
14.
Esen
T
,
Falay
O
,
Tarim
K
,
Armutlu
A
,
Koseoglu
E
,
Kilic
M
,
(68)Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography for primary lymph node staging before radical prostatectomy: central review of imaging and comparison with histopathology of extended lymphadenectomy
.
Eur Urol Focus
.
2021 Jan 25
;
S2405–4569
(
21
):
00005
5
. .
15.
Gupta
M
,
Choudhury
PS
,
Hazarika
D
,
Rawal
S
.
A comparative study of (68)Gallium-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for lymph node staging in high risk prostate cancer patients: an initial experience
.
World J Nucl Med
.
2017
;
16
(
3
):
186
91
.
16.
van Leeuwen
FWB
,
Winter
A
,
van Der Poel
HG
,
Eiber
M
,
Suardi
N
,
Graefen
M
,
Technologies for image-guided surgery for managing lymphatic metastases in prostate cancer
.
Nat Rev Urol
.
2019
;
16
(
3
):
159
71
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.