Introduction: Injuries to surrounding structures during radical prostatectomy (RP) are rare but serious complications. However, it remains unknown if injuries to intestines, rectum, or vascular structures occur at different rates depending on the surgical approach. Methods: We compared the frequency of these outcomes in open RP (ORP) and minimally invasive RP (MIS-RP) using the national American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2012–2017). Along with important metrics of clinical and surgical outcomes, patients were identified as undergoing surgical repair of small or large bowel, vascular structures, or hernias based on Current Procedural Terminology codes. Results: In our propensity matched analysis, a total of 13,044 patients were captured. Bowel injury occurred more frequently in ORP than in MIS-RP (0.89 vs. 0.26%, p < 0.01). By intestinal segment, rectal and large bowel injuries were more common in ORP than MIS-RP (0.41 vs. 0.11% and 0.31 vs. 0.05%, both p < 0.01). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups for small bowel injury (0.17 vs. 0.11%, p = 0.39). Vascular injury was more common in MIS-RP (0.18 vs. 0.08%, p = 0.08). Hernias requiring repair were only identified in the MIS-RP group (0.12%). Conclusion: When considering surgical approach, rectal and large bowel injuries were more common in ORP, while vascular injuries and hernia repair were more common in MIS-RP. Our findings can be used in counseling patients and identifying risk factors and strategies to reduce these complications.

1.
Mandel
P
,
Linnemannstöns
A
,
Chun
F
,
Schlomm
T
,
Pompe
R
,
Budäus
L
,
Incidence, risk factors, management, and complications of rectal injuries during radical prostatectomy
.
Eur Urol Focus
.
2018
;
4
(
4
):
554
7
. .
2.
Wedmid
A
,
Mendoza
P
,
Sharma
S
,
Hastings
RL
,
Monahan
KP
,
Walicki
M
,
Rectal injury during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: incidence and management
.
J Urol
.
2011
;
186
(
5
):
1928
33
.
3.
Kheterpal
E
,
Bhandari
A
,
Siddiqui
S
,
Pokala
N
,
Peabody
J
,
Menon
M
.
Management of rectal injury during robotic radical prostatectomy
.
Urology
.
2011 Apr
;
77
(
4
):
976
9
. .
5.
Barashi
N
,
Pearce
S
,
Cohen
A
,
Pariser
J
,
Packiam
V
,
Eggener
S
.
Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes for rectal injury during radical prostatectomy: a population-based study
.
Eur Urol Oncol
.
2018
;
1
(
6
):
501
6
.
6.
Timm
B
,
O’Connor
E
,
Bolton
D
,
Liodakis
P
.
Are we failing to consent to an increasingly common complication? Incisional hernias at robotic prostatectomy
.
J Robot Surg
.
2020
;
14
(
6
):
861
4
.
7.
Zorn
KC
,
Katz
MH
,
Bernstein
A
,
Shikanov
SA
,
Brendler
CB
,
Zagaja
GP
,
Pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: assessing nodal yield, perioperative outcomes, and complications
.
Urology
.
2009 Aug
;
74
(
2
):
296
302
. .
8.
Dall’Oglio
M
,
Srougi
M
,
Pereira
D
,
Nesrallah
A
,
Andreoni
C
,
Kauffmann
JR
,
Rupture of vesicourethral anastomosis following radical retropubic prostatectomy
.
Int Braz J Urol
.
2003
;
29
(
3
):
221
7
; discussion 227.
9.
Cao
L
,
Yang
Z
,
Qi
L
,
Chen
M
.
Robot-assisted and laparoscopic vs. open radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Medicine
.
2019 May
;
98
(
22
):
e15770
.
10.
Preisser
F
,
Pompe
RS
,
Salomon
G
,
Rosenbaum
C
,
Graefen
M
,
Huland
H
,
Impact of the estimated blood loss during radical prostatectomy on functional outcomes
.
Urol Oncol: Semin Orig Invest
.
2019 May
;
37
(
5
):
e11
298
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.