Background: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) including pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is the current state of the art in surgical therapy of localized prostate cancer with intermediate or high risk. PLND in particular is associated with morbidity inherent to this method; the rate of symptomatic lymphoceles (sLCs), for example, ranges up to 10%. Objective: Various intraoperative modifications have been developed with the aim of reducing the sLC rate. Based on current studies, a peritoneal interposition flap (PIF) appears to be one of the most effective methods for this purpose. Under the criteria of a systematic review, 5 retrospective studies have been identified until now, 4 of which showed a positive effect of PIF on the sLC rate. Results and Limitations: A total of 1,308 patients were included in the aggregated analysis of these 5 studies. The amount of sLCs was 1.3% (8/604) and 5.7% (40/704) in the PIF and standard groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The resulting odds ratio (OR) was 0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05–0.99), taking in-to account a noteworthy heterogeneity of the 5 studies (Q = 9.47, p = 0.05; I2 = 58%). In addition, a prospective randomized and blinded study (Pianoforte trial) with corresponding sLC rates of 8.3% (9/108) versus 9.7% (12/124) (p = 0.820) exists. In this study, the OR was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.34–2.10, p = 0.722). Conclusion: Despite positive results from retrospective studies with indirect evidence, the role of the PIF in the reduction of sLC in RARP could not be conclusively assessed yet. The results of the first prospective randomized study do not show a positive effect of PIF, declaring a research gap for further studies with direct evidence.

1.
Dell’Oglio
P
,
Mottrie
A
,
Mazzone
E
.
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs. open radical prostatectomy: latest evidences on perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes
.
Curr Opin Urol
.
2020
;
30
(
1
):
73
8
. .
2.
Antonelli
A
,
Palumbo
C
,
Noale
M
,
Porreca
A
,
Maggi
S
,
Simeone
C
,
Impact of surgical approach on patient-reported outcomes after radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-weighted analysis from a multicenter, prospective, observational study (rhe pros-IT CNR study)
.
Urol Int
.
2019
;
103
(
1
):
8
18
. .
3.
Kamel
MG
,
Istanbuly
S
,
Abd-Elhay
FA
,
Mohamed
MYF
,
Huu-Hoai
L
,
Sadik
M
,
Examined and positive lymph node counts are associated with mortality in prostate cancer: a population-based analysis
.
Urol Int
.
2020
;
104
(
9–10
):
699
709
. .
4.
Lebeis
C
,
Canes
D
,
Sorcini
A
,
Moinzadeh
A
.
Novel technique prevents lymphoceles after transperitoneal robotic-assisted pelvic lymph node dissection: peritoneal flap interposition
.
Urology
.
2015
;
85
(
6
):
1505
9
. .
5.
Dal Moro
F
,
Zattoni
F
.
P.L.E.A.T.-Preventing lymphocele ensuring absorption transperitoneally: a robotic technique
.
Urology
.
2017
;
110
:
244
7
.
6.
Stolzenburg
JU
,
Arthanareeswaran
VKA
,
Dietel
A
,
Franz
T
,
Liatsikos
E
,
Kyriazis
. I, .
Four-point peritoneal flap fixation in preventing lymphocele formation following radical prostatectomy
.
Eur Urol Oncol
.
2018
;
1
(
5
):
443
8
.
7.
Boğa
MS
,
Sönmez
MG
,
Karamık
K
,
Yılmaz
K
,
Savaş
M
,
Ateş
M
.
The effect of peritoneal re-approximation on lymphocele formation in transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy
.
Turk J Urol
.
2020
;
46
(
6
):
460
7
.
8.
Lee
M
,
Lee
Z
,
Eun
DD
.
Utilization of a peritoneal interposition flap to prevent symptomatic lymphoceles after robotic radical prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection
.
J Endourol
.
2020 Aug
;
34
(
8
):
821
7
. .
9.
Bründl
J
,
Lenart
S
,
Stojanoski
G
,
Gilfrich
C
,
Rosenhammer
B
,
Stolzlechner
M
,
Peritoneal flap in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results of a multicenter, randomized, single-blind study (PIANOFORTE) of the efficacy in reducing postoperative lymphocele
.
Dtsch Arztebl Int
.
2020
;
117
:
243
50
.
10.
Motterle
G
,
Morlacco
A
,
Zanovello
N
,
Ahmed
ME
,
Zattoni
F
,
Karnes
RJ
,
Surgical strategies for lymphocele prevention in minimally invasive radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection: a systematic review
.
J Endourol
.
2020
;
34
(
2
):
113
20
. .
11.
Lenart
S
,
May
M
,
Burger
M
,
Bründl
J
.
Re: utilization of a peritoneal interposition flap to prevent symptomatic lymphoceles after robotic radical prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection by Lee et al
.
J Endourol
.
2020
;
34
(
12
):
1276
7
.. .
12.
Moher
D
,
Shamseer
L
,
Clarke
M
,
Ghersi
D
,
Liberati
A
,
Petticrew
M
,
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
.
Syst Rev
.
2015
;
4
(
1
):
1
. .
13.
Quigley
JM
,
Thompson
JC
,
Halfpenny
NJ
,
Scott
DA
.
Critical appraisal of nonrandomized studies: a review of recommended and commonly used tools
.
J Eval Clin Pract
.
2019 Feb
;
25
(
1
):
44
52
. .
14.
Ploussard
G
,
Briganti
A
,
de la Taille
A
,
Haese
A
,
Heidenreich
A
,
Menon
M
,
Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: efficacy, limitations, and complications-a systematic review of the literature
.
Eur Urol
.
2014
;
65
(
1
):
7
16
. .
15.
Grande
P
,
Di Pierro
GB
,
Mordasini
L
,
Ferrari
M
,
Würnschimmel
C
,
Danuser
H
,
Prospective randomized trial comparing titanium clips to bipolar coagulation in sealing lymphatic vessels during pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
.
Eur Urol
.
2017
;
71
(
2
):
155
8
. .
16.
Seetharam Bhat
KR
,
Onol
F
,
Rogers
T
,
Ganapathi
HP
,
Moschovas
M
,
Roof
S
,
Can we predict who will need lymphocele drainage following robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP)?
J Robot Surg
.
2020
;
14
(
3
):
439
45
. .
17.
Sforza
S
,
Tellini
R
,
Grosso
AA
,
Zaccaro
C
,
Viola
L
,
Di Maida
F
,
Can we predict the development of symptomatic lymphocele following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection? Results from a tertiary referral Centre
.
Scand J Urol
.
2020
;
54
(
4
):
328
33
. .
18.
Andrews
JR
,
Sobol
I
,
Frank
I
,
Gettman
MT
,
Thompson
RH
,
Karnes
RJ
,
Treatment outcomes in patients with symptomatic lymphoceles following radical prostatectomy depend upon size and presence of infection
.
Urology
.
2020 Sep
;
143
:
181
5
. .
19.
Keskin
MS
,
Argun
ÖB
,
Öbek
C
,
Tufek
I
,
Tuna
MB
,
Mourmouris
P
,
The incidence and sequela of lymphocele formation after robot-assisted extended pelvic lymph node dissection
.
BJU Int
.
2016 Jul
;
118
(
1
):
127
31
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.