Objectives: To assess whether biopsy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-negative lobes can be avoided without compromising significant cancer (SC) detection among men with unilateral MRI-positive lobes. Methods: From April 2013 to April 2019, 322 men with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA <20 ng/mL) and unilateral MRI-positive lobes underwent targeted 4-core and systematic 14-core biopsy. MRI findings were prospectively collected and evaluated according to the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2, and scores ≥3 were considered positive. SC was defined as Gleason score ≥3 + 4 or maximal cancer length ≥5 mm. We developed predictive models of overall cancer and SC in MRI-negative lobes and evaluated the performance of these models. Results: Detection rates of overall cancer/SC were 69%/61% for the overall cohort, 58%/48% for MRI-positive lobes, and 36%/20% for MRI-negative lobes. Age ≥75 years, PSA density ≥0.3, and PI-RADS ≥4 were independently predictive of both overall cancer and SC in MRI-negative lobes; 1 point was assigned for each risk factor, and the predictive score was defined as the sum of points (0–3) for both overall cancer and SC. Areas under the curve of the model for overall cancer/SC were 0.67/0.71. In the decision curve analysis, the model was of value above the threshold probability of 13%/6% for detecting overall cancer/SC in MRI-negative lobes. Of 40 men with score 0, overall cancer/SC was detected in the MRI-negative lobe in 4 (10%)/1 (2.5%). Conclusion: Biopsies of MRI-negative lobes may be avoided without compromising SC detection using our predictive model.

1.
Saar
M
,
Linxweiler
J
,
Borkowetz
A
,
Fussek
S
,
Urbanova
K
,
Bellut
L
, et al.
Current role of multiparametric MRI and MRI targeted biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis in Germany: a nationwide survey
.
Urol Int
.
2020
;
104
(
9–10
):
731
40
. .
2.
Elwenspoek
MMC
,
Sheppard
AL
,
McInnes
MDF
,
Merriel
SWD
,
Rowe
EWJ
,
Bryant
RJ
, et al.
Comparison of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy with systematic biopsy alone for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
JAMA Netw Open
.
2019
;
2
(
8
):
e198427
. .
3.
Kasivisvanathan
V
,
Rannikko
AS
,
Borghi
M
,
Panebianco
V
,
Mynderse
LA
,
Vaarala
MH
, et al.
MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis
.
N Engl J Med
.
2018
;
378
(
19
):
1767
77
. .
4.
Nakanishi
Y
,
Ito
M
,
Fukushima
H
,
Yokoyama
M
,
Kataoka
M
,
Ikuta
S
, et al.
Who can avoid systematic biopsy without missing clinically significant prostate cancer in men who undergo magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy?
Clin Genitourin Cancer
.
2019
;
17
(
3
):
e664
e71
. .
5.
Fandella
A
.
Analysis of costs of transrectal prostate biopsy
.
Urologia
.
2011
;
78
(
4
):
288
92
. .
6.
Naughton
CK
,
Miller
DC
,
Yan
Y
.
Impact of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy on quality of life: a prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 cores
.
J Urol
.
2001
;
165
(
1
):
100
3
. .
7.
Moldovan
PC
,
Van den Broeck
T
,
Sylvester
R
,
Marconi
L
,
Bellmunt
J
,
van den Bergh
RCN
, et al.
What is the negative predictive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in excluding prostate cancer at biopsy? A systematic review and meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel
.
Eur Urol
.
2017
;
72
(
2
):
250
. .
8.
Le
JD
,
Tan
N
,
Shkolyar
E
,
Lu
DY
,
Kwan
L
,
Marks
LS
, et al.
Multifocality and prostate cancer detection by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology
.
Eur Urol
.
2015
;
67
(
3
):
569
76
. .
9.
Lovf
M
,
Zhao
S
,
Axcrona
U
,
Johannessen
B
,
Bakken
AC
,
Carm
KT
, et al.
Multifocal primary prostate cancer exhibits high degree of genomic heterogeneity
.
Eur Urol
.
2019
;
75
(
3
):
498
505
.
10.
Valerio
M
,
Donaldson
I
,
Emberton
M
,
Ehdaie
B
,
Hadaschik
BA
,
Marks
LS
, et al.
Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review
.
Eur Urol
.
2015
;
68
(
1
):
8
19
. .
11.
Schoots
IG
,
Roobol
MJ
,
Nieboer
D
,
Bangma
CH
,
Steyerberg
EW
,
Hunink
MG
.
Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Eur Urol
.
2015
;
68
(
3
):
438
50
. .
12.
Wegelin
O
,
van Melick
HH
,
Hooft
L
,
Bosch
JL
,
Reitsma
HB
,
Barentsz
JO
, et al.
Comparing three different techniques for magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsies: a systematic review of in-bore versus magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion versus cognitive registration. Is there a preferred technique?
Eur Urol
.
2017
;
71
(
4
):
517
31
.
13.
Barentsz
JO
,
Richenberg
J
,
Clements
R
,
Choyke
P
,
Verma
S
,
Villeirs
G
, et al.
ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
.
Eur Radiol
.
2012
;
22
(
4
):
746
57
. .
14.
Weinreb
JC
,
Barentsz
JO
,
Choyke
PL
,
Cornud
F
,
Haider
MA
,
Macura
KJ
, et al.
PI-RADS prostate imaging-reporting and data system: 2015, version 2
.
Eur Urol
.
2016
;
69
(
1
):
16
40
.
15.
Kawakami
S
,
Numao
N
,
Okubo
Y
,
Koga
F
,
Yamamoto
S
,
Saito
K
, et al.
Development, validation, and head-to-head comparison of logistic regression-based nomograms and artificial neural network models predicting prostate cancer on initial extended biopsy
.
Eur Urol
.
2008
;
54
(
3
):
601
11
. .
16.
Kubo
Y
,
Kawakami
S
,
Numao
N
,
Takazawa
R
,
Fujii
Y
,
Masuda
H
, et al.
Simple and effective local anesthesia for transperineal extended prostate biopsy: application to three-dimensional 26-core biopsy
.
Int J Urol
.
2009
;
16
(
4
):
420
3
. .
17.
Quentin
M
,
Blondin
D
,
Arsov
C
,
Schimmöller
L
,
Hiester
A
,
Godehardt
E
, et al.
Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen
.
J Urol
.
2014
;
192
(
5
):
1374
9
. .
18.
Thompson
JE
,
van Leeuwen
PJ
,
Moses
D
,
Shnier
R
,
Brenner
P
,
Delprado
W
, et al.
The diagnostic performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect significant prostate cancer
.
J Urol
.
2016
;
195
(
5
):
1428
35
. .
19.
Pettersson
A
,
Robinson
D
,
Garmo
H
,
Holmberg
L
,
Stattin
P
.
Age at diagnosis and prostate cancer treatment and prognosis: a population-based cohort study
.
Ann Oncol
.
2018
;
29
(
2
):
377
85
. .
20.
Jue
JS
,
Barboza
MP
,
Prakash
NS
,
Venkatramani
V
,
Sinha
VR
,
Pavan
N
, et al.
Re-examining prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density: defining the optimal PSA range and patients for using PSA density to predict prostate cancer using extended template biopsy
.
Urology
.
2017
;
105
:
123
8
. .
21.
Filson
CP
,
Natarajan
S
,
Margolis
DJ
,
Huang
J
,
Lieu
P
,
Dorey
FJ
, et al.
Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: the role of systematic and targeted biopsies
.
Cancer
.
2016
;
122
(
6
):
884
92
. .
22.
Woo
S
,
Suh
CH
,
Kim
SY
,
Cho
JY
,
Kim
SH
.
Diagnostic performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 for detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis
.
Eur Urol
.
2017
;
72
(
2
):
177
88
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.