Background: Many surgical techniques, as well as dressing models, were identified in the treatment of hypospadias. There are many publications in the literature that are the result of the effort to find the ideal dressing after hypospadias surgery. The dressing has some benefits; however, it has some adverse effects. The present study aimed to discuss outcomes of the patients who have been operated through the tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (TIPU) method and followed with and without dressing postoperatively. Methods: Patients operated on through the TIPU method between March 2015 and August 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups, dressing and undressing. Preoperative hypospadias severity was evaluated according to the Glans-Urethral Meatus-Shaft (GMS) scoring method. The care results of the patients were recorded. Postoperative outcomes were compared according to the Hypospadias Objective Scoring Evaluation (HOSE) scale, and statistical analyses were conducted. The results of both groups were compared statistically. Results: One hundred and nineteen patients were divided into two groups: dressing (n = 56) and nondressing (n = 63). The patients’ average age was 3.54 ± 2.97 years in group 1 and 3.50 ± 3.01 years in group 2 (p = 0.940). There was not any statistically significant difference between the two groups for demographic data. Minimal bleeding had stopped in three patients in the nondressing group spontaneously before discharging. No severe edema or hematoma, which might have concerned the parents, appeared. Two (3.5%) and 3 (4.7%) patients underwent a maximum of three urethral dilation sessions in dressing and nondressing groups, respectively (p = 0.556). We found no significant difference between groups in the comparison of preoperative GMS and postoperative HOSE scoring. Discussion: The most important limitation of the study is that it is retrospective. Pre- and postoperative scoring systems are objective. The data obtained in the literature show that surgeons prefer to apply dressings commonly after the TIPU technique. Advantages and disadvantages of dressing are mentioned in the literature. Even if the paradigm is dressing in hypospadias surgery, according to the results of our study, dressing may not affect the functional and cosmetic results of TIPU repair. Conclusion: Postoperative functional and cosmetic results of TIPU in hypospadias appear to be independent of dressing. However, the results must be supported by further research.

1.
Martins
AG
,
Lima
SV
,
Araújo
LA
,
Vilar
Fde O
,
Cavalcante
NT
.
A wet dressing for hypospadias surgery
.
Int Braz j Urol
.
2013
;
39
:
408
13
. .
2.
Whitaker
RH
,
Dennis
MJ
.
Silastic foam dressing in hypospadias surgery
.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl
.
1987
;
69
:
59
60
.
3.
Zarenezhad
M
,
Hedjazi
A
,
Hosseini
SM
,
Rasekhi
A
.
Cyanoacrylate glue dressing for hypospadias surgery
.
N Am J Med Sci
.
2012
;
4
:
320
.
4.
Narci
A
,
Boyaci
E
,
Çetinkursun
S
,
Embleton
D
,
Mingir
S
.
A practical offer for hypospadias dressing: Allevyn®
.
African J Paediatr Surg
.
2011
;
8
:
272
.
5.
Tan
KK
,
Reid
CD
.
A simple penile dressing following hypospadias surgery
.
Br J Plast Surg
.
1990
;
43
:
628
9
. .
6.
Redman
JF
,
Smith
JP
.
Surgical dressing for hypospadias repair
.
Urology
.
1974
;
4
:
739
40
. .
7.
Gaylis
FD
,
Zaontz
MR
,
Dalton
D
,
Sugar
EC
,
Maizels
M
.
Silicone foam dressing for penis after reconstructive pediatric surgery
.
Urology
.
1989
;
33
:
296
9
. .
8.
Hadidi
AT
.
Dressing versus no dressing
.
Berlin
:
Springer
;
2004
.
9.
Dumville
JC
,
Gray
TA
,
Walter
CJ
,
Sharp
CA
,
Page
T
,
Macefield
R
,
Dressings for the prevention of surgical site infection
.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
.
2016
;
12
:
CD003091
. .
10.
McLorie
G
,
Joyner
B
,
Herz
D
,
McCallum
J
,
Bagli
D
,
Merguerian
P
,
A prospective randomized clinical trial to evaluate methods of postoperative care of hypospadias
.
J Urol
.
2001
;
165
:
1669
72
. .
11.
Van Savage
JG
,
Palanca
LG
,
Slaughenhoupt
BL
.
A prospective randomized trial of dressings versus no dressings for hypospadias repair
.
J Urol
.
2000
;
164
:
981
3
. .
12.
Snodgrass
W
.
Tubularized, incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias
.
J Urol
.
1994
;
151
(
2
):
464
5
. .
13.
Holland
AJ
,
Smith
GH
,
Ross
FI
,
Cass
DT
.
HOSE: an objective scoring system for evaluating the results of hypospadias surgery
.
BJU Int
.
2001
;
88
:
255
8
. .
14.
Arlen
AM
,
Kirsch
AJ
,
Leong
T
,
Broecker
BH
,
Smith
EA
,
Elmore
JM
.
Further analysis of the Glans-Urethral Meatus-Shaft (GMS) hypospadias score: correlation with postoperative complications
.
J Pediatr Urol
.
2015
;
11
:
71
5
. .
15.
Hadidi
A
,
Abdaal
N
,
Kaddah
S
.
Hypospadias repair: is dressing important?
Kasr EI Aini J Surg
.
2003
;
4
:
37
44
.
16.
Snodgrass
W
,
Koyle
M
,
Manzoni
G
,
Hurwitz
R
,
Caldamone
A
,
Ehrlich
R
.
Tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair: results of a multi-center experience
.
J Urol
.
1996
;
156
:
839
41
.
17.
Sanders
C
,
Young
A
,
McAndrew
HF
,
Kenny
SE
.
A prospective randomized trial of the effect of a soluble adhesive on the ease of dressing removal following hypospadias repair
.
J Pediatr Urol
.
2007
;
3
:
209
13
. .
18.
Boateng
J
,
Catanzano
O
.
Advanced therapeutic dressings for effective wound healing: a review
.
J Pharm Sci
.
2015
;
104
:
3653
80
. .
19.
Phillips
SJ
.
Physiology of wound healing and surgical wound care
.
ASAIO J
.
2000
;
46
:
S2
5
. .
20.
Gormley
A
,
Fishwick
J
,
Whitnall
B
.
Home dressing removal following hypospadias repair
.
J Child Health Care
.
2007
;
11
:
158
66
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.