Introduction: Computed tomography (CT) or ultrasonography (USG)-guided renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is not suitable in all cases with retro-renal colon (RRC) due to anatomical and technical restrictions. We would like to describe our novel technique that permits standard subcostal renal access with a small incision for these patients. Methods: This method was performed on adult patients with severe RRC and complex renal stones who were not suitable for renal access with CT or USG guidance. Time from skin incision to puncture needle insertion, incision length, stone-free rate (SFR), and complications were evaluated. Surgical Technique: The appropriate renal calyx for renal access was identified with retrograde pyelography. The skin closest to the identified calyx was incised and retroperitoneum visualized. The RRC was swept laterally by blunt dissection to obtain a safe puncture line. The retractors were placed to keep the colon away from the incision. Then, the puncture needle was placed over Gerota’s fascia. After this, the puncture needle was inserted into the targeted calyx under fluoroscopic guidance. The insertion of guidewire and the rest of the procedure such as dilatation and insertion of Amplatz sheath were performed under same maneuver. Results: A total of 1,348 patients were treated with PNL between January 2016 and November 2019. Our group consisted of 16 adult patients with a median age of 44.8 years (7 females and 9 males) who underwent PNL with our new access technique. SFR and clinically insignificant residual fragment (CIRF) rate were 72.5 and 14.2%, respectively. The median access time was 22.2 min (range: 15–30 min). The median skin incision length was 3.7 (range: 3.0–4.5) cm. The average skin incision length was 3.7 cm. The SFR and CIRF rate were 72.5 and 14.2%, respectively. We did not observe any complication related to our access technique. Conclusion: Our novel access technique created a safe anatomical route for standard subcostal renal access with acceptable incision length and very low complication rate.

1.
Sharma
G
,
Jangid
DK
,
Yadav
SS
,
Mathur
R
,
Tomar
V
.
Retro-renal colon: role in percutaneous access
.
Urolithiasis
.
2015 Apr
;
43
(
2
):
171
5
.
2.
Akbulut
F
,
Tok
A
,
Penbegul
N
,
Daggulli
M
,
Eryildirim
B
,
Adanur
S
, et al.
Colon perforation related to percutaneous nephrolithotomy: from diagnosis to treatment
.
Urolithiasis
.
2015 Nov
;
43
(
6
):
521
6
.
3.
Alken
P
,
Hutschenreiter
G
,
Günther
R
,
Marberger
M
.
Percutaneous stone manipulation
.
J Urol
.
1981 Apr
;
125
(
4
):
463
6
.
4.
Matlaga
BR
,
Shah
OD
,
Zagoria
RJ
,
Dyer
RB
,
Streem
SB
,
Assimos
DG
.
Computerized tomography guided access for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy
.
J Urol
.
2003 Jul
;
170
(
1
):
45
7
.
5.
Tuttle
DN
,
Yeh
BM
,
Meng
MV
,
Breiman
RS
,
Stoller
ML
,
Coakley
FV
.
Risk of injury to adjacent organs with lower-pole fluoroscopically guided percutaneous nephrostomy: evaluation with prone, supine, and multiplanar reformatted CT
.
J Vasc Interv Radiol
.
2005 Nov
;
16
(
11
):
1489
92
.
6.
Melo
PAS
,
Vicentini
FC
,
Cohen
DJ
,
Hisano
M
,
Murta
CB
,
Claro
JFA
.
Laparoscopic: assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy as an alternative in the treatment of complex renal calculi in patients with retrorenal colon
.
Int Braz J Urol
.
2018 Mar-Apr
;
44
(
2
):
405
6
.
7.
Prassopoulos
P
,
Gourtsoyiannis
N
,
Cavouras
D
,
Pantelidis
N
.
A study of the variation of colonic positioning in the pararenal space as shown by computed tomography
.
Eur J Radiol
.
1990 Jan-Feb
;
10
(
1
):
44
7
.
8.
Thomas
K
,
Smith
NC
,
Hegarty
N
,
Glass
JM
.
The Guy’s stone score: grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures
.
Urology
.
2011 Aug
;
78
(
2
):
277
81
.
9.
Dindo
D
,
Demartines
N
,
Clavien
PA
.
Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey
.
Ann Surg
.
2004 Aug
;
240
(
2
):
205
13
.
10.
Hopper
KD
,
Sherman
JL
,
Luethke
JM
,
Ghaed
N
.
The retrorenal colon in the supine and prone patient
.
Radiology
.
1987 Feb
;
162
(
2
):
443
6
.
11.
Balasar
M
,
Kandemir
A
,
Poyraz
N
,
Unal
Y
,
Ozturk
A
.
Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
.
Int Braz J Urol
.
2015 Mar-Apr
;
41
(
2
):
274
8
.
12.
El-Nahas
AR
,
Shokeir
AA
,
El-Assmy
AM
,
Mohsen
T
,
Shoma
AM
,
Eraky
I
, et al.
Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy extensive hemorrhage: a study of risk factors
.
J Urol
.
2007 Feb
;
177
(
2
):
576
9
.
13.
Wein
AJ
,
Kavoussi
LR
,
Campbell
MF
.
Campbell-Walsh urology
. 10th ed.
Philadelphia, PA
:
Elsevier Saunders
;
2012
.
14.
Skolarikos
A
,
de la Rosette
J
.
Prevention and treatment of complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
.
Curr Opin Urol
.
2008 Mar
;
18
(
2
):
229
34
.
15.
Türk
C
,
Neisius
A
,
Petřík
A
,
Seitz
C
,
Thomas
K
,
Skolarikos
A
.
EAU guidelines on urolithiasis 2020. European association of urology guidelines 2020 edition
.
Arnhem, The Netherlands
:
The European Association of Urology Guidelines Office
;
2020
.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.