Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy are attracting increased attention from urologists. They can achieve the same effect of oncology control as radical nephrectomy; moreover, they can offer better preservation of renal function, thus obtaining long-term living benefits. The indications are also expanding, making it possible for larger and more difficult tumors. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy can be performed by transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches, with their individual advantages and limitations. In addition, the renal tumor scoring systems have been widely used and studied in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. In -order to better preserve renal function, the zero-ischemia technique is widely used. The application of intraoperative imaging technology provides convenience and greater benefits. Besides, whether minimal invasive partial nephrectomy can be performed without stop antiplatelet treatment is still disputed. Clinicians perform substantial exploration and practice to achieve the “trifecta” of surgery: complete resection of the tumor, maximum protection of renal function, and no complications.

1.
Winfield
HN
,
Donovan
JF
,
Godet
AS
,
Clayman
RV
.
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial case report for benign disease
.
J Endourol
.
1993
;
7
(
6
):
521
6
.
2.
MacLennan
S
,
Imamura
M
,
Lapitan
MC
,
Omar
MI
,
Lam
TB
,
Hilvano-Cabungcal
AM
, et al.
Systematic review of oncological outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer
.
Eur Urol
.
2012
;
61
(
5
):
972
93
.
3.
Ljungberg
B
,
Cowan
NC
,
Hanbury
DC
,
Hora
M
,
Kuczyk
MA
,
Merseburger
AS
, et al.
EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update
.
Eur Urol
.
2010
;
58
(
3
):
398
406
.
4.
Pavan
N
,
Derweesh
IH
,
Mir
CM
,
Novara
G
,
Hampton
LJ
,
Ferro
M
, et al.
Outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy for large (>4 cm) kidney tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Ann Surg Oncol
.
2017
;
24
(
8
):
2420
8
.
5.
Buffi
NM
,
Saita
A
,
Lughezzani
G
,
Porter
J
,
Dell’Oglio
P
,
Amparore
D
, et al.
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex (PADUA score ≥10) tumors: techniques and results from a multicenter experience at four high-volume centers
.
Eur Urol
.
2020
;
77
(
1
):
95
100
.
6.
Ludwig
WW
,
Gorin
MA
,
Pierorazio
PM
,
Allaf
ME
.
Frontiers in robot-assisted retroperitoneal oncological surgery
.
Nat Rev Urol
.
2017
;
14
(
12
):
731
41
.
7.
Richstone
L
,
Montag
S
,
Ost
M
,
Reggio
E
,
Permpongkosol
S
,
Kavoussi
LR
.
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: evaluation of short-term oncologic outcome
.
Urology
.
2008
;
71
(
1
):
36
40
.
8.
Shikanov
S
,
Lifshitz
DA
,
Deklaj
T
,
Katz
MH
,
Shalhav
AL
.
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for technically challenging tumours
.
BJU Int
.
2010
;
106
(
1
):
91
4
.
9.
Gu
L
,
Liu
K
,
Shen
D
,
Li
H
,
Gao
Y
,
Huang
Q
, et al.
Comparison of robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors: a high-volume center experience
.
J Endourol
.
2020
;
34
(
5
):
581
587
.
Epub ahead of print
.
10.
Baccala
A
,
Lee
U
,
Hegarty
N
,
Desai
M
,
Kaouk
J
,
Gill
I
.
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumour in the presence of nephrolithiasis or pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction
.
BJU Int
.
2009
;
103
(
5
):
660
2
.
11.
Abaza
R
,
Angell
J
.
Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinomas with venous tumor thrombus
.
Urology
.
2013
;
81
(
6
):
1362
7
.
12.
Froghi
S
,
Ahmed
K
,
Khan
MS
,
Dasgupta
P
,
Challacombe
B
.
Evaluation of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for small renal tumours (T1a)
.
BJU Int
.
2013
;
112
(
4
):
E322
33
.
13.
Aboumarzouk
OM
,
Stein
RJ
,
Eyraud
R
,
Haber
GP
,
Chlosta
PL
,
Somani
BK
, et al.
Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Eur Urol
.
2012
;
62
(
6
):
1023
33
.
14.
Choi
JE
,
You
JH
,
Kim
DK
,
Rha
KH
,
Lee
SH
.
Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Eur Urol
.
2015
;
67
(
5
):
891
901
.
15.
Thiel
DD
,
Winfield
HN
.
Robotics in urology: past, present, and future
.
J Endourol
.
2008
;
22
(
4
):
825
30
.
16.
Pavan
N
,
Derweesh
I
,
Hampton
LJ
,
White
WM
,
Porter
J
,
Challacombe
BJ
, et al.
Retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative outcomes
.
J Endourol
.
2018
;
32
(
7
):
591
6
.
17.
Arora
S
,
Heulitt
G
,
Menon
M
,
Jeong
W
,
Ahlawat
RK
,
Capitanio
U
, et al.
Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: comparison in a multi-institutional setting
.
Urology
.
2018
;
120
:
131
7
.
18.
Mittakanti
HR
,
Heulitt
G
,
Li
HF
,
Porter
JR
.
Transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a matched-paired analysis
.
World J Urol
.
2020
;
38
(
5
):
1093
9
.
Epub ahead of print
.
19.
Kutikov
A
,
Uzzo
RG
.
The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth
.
J Urol
.
2009
;
182
(
3
):
844
53
.
20.
Hayn
MH
,
Schwaab
T
,
Underwood
W
,
Kim
HL
.
RENAL nephrometry score predicts surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
.
BJU Int
.
2011
;
108
(
6
):
876
81
.
21.
Sugiura
M
,
Suyama
T
,
Kanesaka
M
,
Fujimoto
A
,
Hou
K
,
Araki
K
, et al.
Usefulness of R.E.N.A.L nephrometry scoring system and centrality index score for predicting outcome of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
.
2016
;
26
(
10
):
784
8
.
22.
Hew
MN
,
Baseskioglu
B
,
Barwari
K
,
Axwijk
PH
,
Can
C
,
Horenblas
S
, et al.
Critical appraisal of the PADUA classification and assessment of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy
.
J Urol
.
2011
;
186
(
1
):
42
6
.
23.
Mayer
WA
,
Godoy
G
,
Choi
JM
,
Goh
AC
,
Bian
SX
,
Link
RE
.
Higher RENAL nephrometry score is predictive of longer warm ischemia time and collecting system entry during laparoscopic and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy
.
Urology
.
2012
;
79
(
5
):
1052
6
.
24.
Stroup
SP
,
Palazzi
K
,
Kopp
RP
,
Mehrazin
R
,
Santomauro
M
,
Cohen
SA
, et al.
RENAL nephrometry score is associated with operative approach for partial nephrectomy and urine leak
.
Urology
.
2012
;
80
(
1
):
151
6
.
25.
Veccia
A
,
Antonelli
A
,
Uzzo
RG
,
Novara
G
,
Kutikov
A
,
Ficarra
V
, et al.
Predictive value of nephrometry scores in nephron-sparing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Eur Urol Focus
.
2020
;
6
(
3
):
490
504
.
Epub ahead of print
.
26.
Satasivam
P
,
Sengupta
S
,
Rajarubendra
N
,
Chia
PH
,
Munshey
A
,
Bolton
D
.
Renal lesions with low R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score are associated with more indolent renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) or benign histology: findings in an Australian cohort
.
BJU Int
.
2012
;
109
(
Suppl 3
):
44
7
.
27.
Ficarra
V
,
Novara
G
,
Secco
S
,
Macchi
V
,
Porzionato
A
,
De Caro
R
, et al.
Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery
.
Eur Urol
.
2009
;
56
(
5
):
786
93
.
28.
Simmons
MN
,
Ching
CB
,
Samplaski
MK
,
Park
CH
,
Gill
IS
.
Kidney tumor location measurement using the C index method
.
J Urol
.
2010
;
183
(
5
):
1708
13
.
29.
Simmons
MN
,
Hillyer
SP
,
Lee
BH
,
Fergany
AF
,
Kaouk
J
,
Campbell
SC
.
Diameter-axial-polar nephrometry: integration and optimization of R.E.N.A.L. and centrality index scoring systems
.
J Urol
.
2012
;
188
(
2
):
384
90
.
30.
Spaliviero
M
,
Poon
BY
,
Karlo
CA
,
Guglielmetti
GB
,
Di Paolo
PL
,
Beluco Corradi
R
, et al.
An arterial based complexity (ABC) scoring system to assess the morbidity profile of partial nephrectomy
.
Eur Urol
.
2016
;
69
(
1
):
72
9
.
31.
Yoshida
K
,
Kinoshita
H
,
Yoshida
T
,
Takayasu
K
,
Mishima
T
,
Yanishi
M
, et al.
Comparison of diameter-axial-polar nephrometry score and RENAL nephrometry score for surgical outcomes following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
.
Int J Urol
.
2016
;
23
(
2
):
148
52
.
32.
Davidiuk
AJ
,
Parker
AS
,
Thomas
CS
,
Leibovich
BC
,
Castle
EP
,
Heckman
MG
, et al.
Mayo adhesive probability score: an accurate image-based scoring system to predict adherent perinephric fat in partial nephrectomy
.
Eur Urol
.
2014
;
66
(
6
):
1165
71
.
33.
Liu
W
,
Li
Y
,
Chen
M
,
Gu
L
,
Tong
S
,
Lei
Y
, et al.
Off-clamp versus complete hilar control partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
J Endourol
.
2014
;
28
(
5
):
567
76
.
34.
Trehan
A
.
Comparison of off-clamp partial nephrectomy and on-clamp partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Urol Int
.
2014
;
93
(
2
):
125
34
.
35.
Rais-Bahrami
S
,
George
AK
,
Herati
AS
,
Srinivasan
AK
,
Richstone
L
,
Kavoussi
LR
.
Off-clamp versus complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison by clinical stage
.
BJU Int
.
2012
;
109
(
9
):
1376
81
.
36.
Simone
G
,
Gill
IS
,
Mottrie
A
,
Kutikov
A
,
Patard
JJ
,
Alcaraz
A
, et al.
Indications, techniques, outcomes, and limitations for minimally ischemic and off-clamp partial nephrectomy: a systematic review of the literature
.
Eur Urol
.
2015
;
68
(
4
):
632
40
.
37.
Shah
PH
,
George
AK
,
Moreira
DM
,
Alom
M
,
Okhunov
Z
,
Salami
S
, et al.
To clamp or not to clamp? Long-term functional outcomes for elective off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
.
BJU Int
.
2016
;
117
(
2
):
293
9
.
38.
Gill
IS
,
Eisenberg
MS
,
Aron
M
,
Berger
A
,
Ukimura
O
,
Patil
MB
, et al.
“Zero ischemia” partial nephrectomy: novel laparoscopic and robotic technique
.
Eur Urol
.
2011
;
59
(
1
):
128
34
.
39.
Mattevi
D
,
Luciani
LG
,
Mantovani
W
,
Cai
T
,
Chiodini
S
,
Vattovani
V
, et al.
Fluorescence-guided selective arterial clamping during RAPN provides better early functional outcomes based on renal scan compared to standard clamping
.
J Robot Surg
.
2019
;
13
(
3
):
391
6
.
40.
Hyams
ES
,
Kanofsky
JA
,
Stifelman
MD
.
Laparoscopic Doppler technology: applications in laparoscopic pyeloplasty and radical and partial nephrectomy
.
Urology
.
2008
;
71
(
5
):
952
6
.
41.
Hyams
ES
,
Perlmutter
M
,
Stifelman
MD
.
A prospective evaluation of the utility of laparoscopic Doppler technology during minimally invasive partial nephrectomy
.
Urology
.
2011
;
77
(
3
):
617
20
.
42.
Hekman
MCH
,
Rijpkema
M
,
Langenhuijsen
JF
,
Boerman
OC
,
Oosterwijk
E
,
Mulders
PFA
.
Intraoperative imaging techniques to support complete tumor resection in partial nephrectomy
.
Eur Urol Focus
.
2018
;
4
(
6
):
960
8
.
43.
Althaus
AB
,
Dovirak
O
,
Chang
P
,
Taylor
KN
,
O'Halloran
TD
,
Wagner
AA
.
Aspirin and clopidogrel during robotic partial nephrectomy, is it safe?
Can J Urol
.
2015
;
22
(
5
):
7984
9
.
44.
Leavitt
DA
,
Keheila
M
,
Siev
M
,
Shah
PH
,
Moreira
DM
,
George
AK
, et al.
Outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients continuing aspirin therapy
.
J Urol
.
2016
;
195
(
4 Pt 1
):
859
64
.
45.
Pradere
B
,
Peyronnet
B
,
Seisen
T
,
Khene
Z
,
Ruggiero
M
,
Vaessen
C
, et al.
Impact of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs on perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy
.
Urology
.
2017
;
99
:
118
22
.
46.
Ito
T
,
Derweesh
IH
,
Ginzburg
S
,
Abbosh
PH
,
Raheem
OA
,
Mirheydar
H
, et al.
Perioperative outcomes following partial nephrectomy performed on patients remaining on antiplatelet therapy
.
J Urol
.
2017
;
197
:
31
6
.
47.
Richstone
L
,
Montag
S
,
Ost
MC
,
Reggio
E
,
Seideman
C
,
Permpongkosol
S
, et al.
Predictors of hemorrhage after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
.
Urology
.
2011
;
77
(
1
):
88
91
.
48.
Kara
Ö
,
Maurice
MJ
,
Mouracade
P
,
Malkoç
E
,
Dagenais
J
,
Nelson
RJ
, et al.
When partial nephrectomy is unsuccessful: understanding the reasons for conversion from robotic partial to radical nephrectomy at a tertiary referral center
.
J Urol
.
2017
;
198
(
1
):
30
5
.
49.
Richstone
L
,
Seideman
C
,
Baldinger
L
,
Permpongkosol
S
,
Jarrett
TW
,
Su
LM
, et al.
Conversion during laparoscopic surgery: frequency, indications and risk factors
.
J Urol
.
2008
;
180
(
3
):
855
9
.
50.
Gill
IS
,
Kamoi
K
,
Aron
M
,
Desai
MM
.
800 laparoscopic partial nephrectomies: a single surgeon series
.
J Urol
.
2010
;
183
(
1
):
34
41
.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.