Dear Editor,

We read with interest the article by Balci et al. [1] regarding the surgical outcomes and clinical improvement 1 year after laparoscopic partial adrenalectomy (LPA) for the treatment of patients with nonhereditary unilateral functional adrenal adenomas. This article is one of the few reports which address the issue of LPA. Their results showed that LPA is safe and feasible, and has similar therapeutic results to laparoscopic total adrenalectomy (LTA) in patients with a nonhereditary hormonally active unilateral adrenal mass [1]. Furthermore, LPA can obviate the need for steroid replacement in these patients [1]. Nakada et al. [2] found that patients with unilateral adrenalectomy do not respond as robustly to stressful situations as do normal controls. Furthermore, if the remaining adrenal gland requires future surgical therapy or suffers functional impairment, the patient may lose his/her remaining source of steroid production [2]. Therefore, preserving the maximal amount of normal adrenal cortex can leave patients with adequate hormonal reserve and avoid the need for long-term steroid therapy. Similar to the authors above, we examined the perioperative surgical and long-term outcomes of LPA [3]. Balci et al. [1] reported that the mean operative time and estimated blood loss were similar between the groups. However, in our study, the mean operative time was significantly shorter and the mean estimated blood loss was significantly higher in the LPA group than in the LTA group. A large and randomized prospective study is required to clarify these different findings. Nevertheless, we believe that LPA has major advantage for preservation of functioning adrenal gland compared to those of LTA. Furthermore, LPA is more meaningful in patients with bilateral involvement than in those with a solitary adrenal gland, as well as those with hereditary adrenal diseases such as multiple endocrine neoplasia and von Hippel-Landau disease.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

The authors did not receive any funding.

Conception: Y.B. Jeong and Y.S. Shin, drafting: Y.S. Shin, editing and supervision: Y.B. Jeong and H.J. Kim, and final approval: Y.B. Jeong, Y.S. Shin, and H.J. Kim.

1.
Balci
M
,
Tuncel
A
,
Aslan
Y
,
Aykanat
C
,
Berker
D
,
Guzel
O
.
Laparoscopic partial versus total adrenalectomy in nonhereditary unilateral adrenal masses
.
Urol Int
.
2020
;
104
(
1–2
):
75
80
.
2.
Nakada
T
,
Kubota
Y
,
Sasagawa
I
,
Yagisawa
T
,
Watanabe
M
,
Ishigooka
M
.
Therapeutic outcome of primary aldosteronism: adrenalectomy versus enucleation of aldosterone-producing adenoma
.
J Urol
.
1995
;
153
(
6
):
1775
80
.
3.
Ko
OS
,
Kim
JY
,
Kim
HJ
,
Jeong
YB
.
Laparoscopic partial adrenalectomy: surgical technique and outcome
.
Korean J Urol Oncol
.
2019
;
17
(
2
):
103
9
.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.