Introduction: A number of factors that can impact the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures have previously been investigated. Complex stones that extend to the anterior calyx could affect the success and complication rates of PCNL. Objective: We analyzed the effect of anterior calyx involvement on the outcomes of patients with complex stones treated with PCNL. Methods: A total of 132 consecutive patients who underwent PCNL due to complex stones (multiple, partial staghorn, or staghorn stones) between 2015 and 2017 were enrolled in this study. They were stratified into two groups based on whether the stone extended to the anterior calyx (group 1, n = 45) or not (group 2, n = 87). The stratification was achieved through contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CT). Demographics, laboratory tests, and peri- and postoperative findings (operation and fluoroscopy duration, hospital stay, utilization of flexible instruments, access numbers, total blood count change, stone-free rate [SFR], and complications) were compared between the groups. The SFR was evaluated by plain kidney-ureter-bladder radiography or CT. Results: The demographics, operation and fluoroscopy duration, access number, and hospital stay were similar between the groups (p < 0.05). A higher drop in the hemoglobin level in group 1 was identified (group 1 [2.14 ± 1.49 g/dL] vs. group 2 [1.43 ± 1.31 g/dL]) (p = 0.006). The SFR among the patients with extension to the anterior calyx was 60%, compared to 77% among the patients with no extension to the anterior calyx (p = 0.041). Flexible instruments were utilized in 60% of the patients of group 1, which was a higher rate than for group 2 (36%) (p = 0.007). Complication rates were similar in the two groups according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that complicated stones with extension to the anterior calyx are more challenging than cases without extension to the anterior calyx. This was noted by a lower SFR, a more prominent drop in total blood count, and more frequent utilization of flexible scopes.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.