Introduction: The success of upper urinary tract endoscopy on one hand and the high cost of purchase and maintenance of the scopes on the other hand have driven the development of disposable digital flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS). Materials and Methods: We performed an ex vivo comparison of 2 disposable digital fURS from different companies with a state-of-the-art reusable endoscope from another well-established scope manufacturer. The scopes were tested comparing parameters such as instrument handling, irrigation flow, image quality, and deflection. For the disposable scopes, the latter 2 were evaluated both, before and after vigorous stress testing. Results: Expectedly, the most consistent finding among the 3 instruments was the marked decrease on irrigation flow following insertion of a working element, most notably a guidewire. Depth perception and ergonomic handling were comparable in all 3 instruments. Poststress testing revealed a significant loss of upward deflection in both disposable instruments, more so when an auxiliary instrument is inserted into the working channel. However, this did not appear to be the case in downward deflection. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study that used a vigorous stress testing protocol comparing disposable and reusable fURS. The newer generation disposable scope fared better than the older one. Results are encouraging and indicate that improvements are ongoing and progressing, bringing the quality of disposable scopes to the level that we are used to from our reusable high performance scopes while at the same time avoiding costly damage repairs. Continuous research and evidence-based interpretation of results in the absence of commercial bias are paramount to ensure this ongoing development.

Keywords:
Ureterorenoscopy, Flexible, Disposable, Stress test, Irrigation, Handling, Deflection, Image quality
1.
Bagley DH. Flexible ureteropyeloscopy with modular, “disposable” endoscope.
Urology
. 1987 Mar;29(3):296–300.
2.
D’amico FC, Belis JA. Treatment of ureteral calculi with an 8.3F disposable shaft rigid ureteroscope.
J Stone Dis
. 1993 Oct;5(4):213–6.
3.
Ng YH, Somani BK, Dennison A, Kata SG, Nabi G, Brown S. Irrigant flow and intrarenal pressure during flexible ureteroscopy: the effect of different access sheaths, working channel instruments, and hydrostatic pressure.
J Endourol
. 2010 Dec;24(12):1915–20.
4.
Doizi S, Kamphuis G, Giusti G, Andreassen KH, Knoll T, Osther PJ, et al. First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVueTM): a European prospective multicentric feasibility study.
World J Urol
. 2017 May;35(5):809–18.
5.
Proietti S, Dragos L, Molina W, Doizi S, Giusti G, Traxer O. Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model.
J Endourol
. 2016 Jun;30(6):655–9.
6.
Tom WR, Wollin DA, Jiang R, Radvak D, Simmons WN, Preminger GM, et al. Next-Generation Single-Use Ureteroscopes: An In Vitro Comparison.
J Endourol
. 2017 Dec;31(12):1301–6.
7.
Dale J, Kaplan AG, Radvak D, Shin R, Ackerman A, Chen T, et al. Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.
J Endourol
. 2017, Epub ahead of print.
8.
Boylu U, Oommen M, Thomas R, Lee BR. In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes.
J Urol
. 2009 Nov;182(5):2347–51.
9.
Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Walther S, Schlenker B, Tilki D, Hocaoglu Y, et al. The PolyScope: a modular design, semidisposable flexible ureterorenoscope system.
J Endourol
. 2010 Jul;24(7):1061–6.
10.
Bansal H, Swain S, Sharma GK, Mathanya M, Trivedi S, Dwivedi US, et al. Polyscope: a new era in flexible ureterorenoscopy.
J Endourol
. 2011 Feb;25(2):317–21.
11.
Johnson MT, Khemees TA, Knudsen BE. Resilience of disposable endoscope optical fiber properties after repeat sterilization.
J Endourol
. 2013 Jan;27(1):71–4.
12.
Marchini GS, Batagello CA, Monga M, Torricelli FC, Vicentini FC, Danilovic A, et al. In Vitro Evaluation of Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Practical Comparison for a Patient-Centered Approach.
J Endourol
. 2018 Mar;32(3):184–91.
13.
Taguchi K, Harper JD, Stoller ML, Duty BD, Sorensen MD, Sur RL, et al. Identifying factors associated with need for flexible ureteroscope repair: a Western Endourology STone (WEST) research consortium prospective cohort study.
Urolithiasis
. 2018 Nov;46(6):559–66.
14.
Taguchi K, Usawachintachit M, Tzou DT, Sherer BA, Metzler I, Isaacson D, et al. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.
J Endourol
. 2018 Apr;32(4):267–73.
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
2019
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.