Objective: To investigate the optimal age for the baseline serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test and for repeat screening and its economic burden in a single center in China. Materials and Methods: 35,533 men with PSA screening were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Follow-ups were conducted in 1,586 men with PSA >4 ng/mL, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to investigate the optimal cutoffs. Results: ROC analysis indicated that the optimal age for initial PSA screening was 57.5 years (AUC = 0.84), 62.5 years (AUC = 0.902), 60.5 years (AUC = 0.909), and 61.5 years (AUC = 0.890) for individuals with PSA >4 and >10 ng/mL, a diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa), and clinically significant PCa defined as the focus events, respectively. For Chinese men aged 50–59, 60–69, and >70 years, the initial PSA levels of 1.305 ng/mL (AUC = 0.699), 1.975 ng/mL (AUC = 0.711), and 2.740 ng/mL (AUC = 0.720) might have a PSA velocity >0.75 ng/mL per year during the follow-up. In addition, the total cost amounts to CNY 13,609,260 in these cases, but only 60 of the 35,533 (0.17%) men gained benefit from PSA screening. Conclusion: In our opinion, the optimal starting age for initial PSA testing was 57.5 years. The necessity for repeat screening should be based on the first PSA level depending on age. A cost--benefit analysis should be included in population-based screening.

1.
Bray
F
,
Ferlay
J
,
Soerjomataram
I
,
Siegel
RL
,
Torre
LA
,
Jemal
A
.
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
.
CA Cancer J Clin
.
2018
Nov
;
68
(
6
):
394
424
.
[PubMed]
0007-9235
2.
Lin
K
,
Lipsitz
R
,
Miller
T
,
Janakiraman
S
;
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
.
Benefits and harms of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: an evidence update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
.
Ann Intern Med
.
2008
Aug
;
149
(
3
):
192
9
.
[PubMed]
0003-4819
3.
Vickers
AJ
.
Prostate Cancer Screening: Time to Question How to Optimize the Ratio of Benefits and Harms
.
Ann Intern Med
.
2017
Oct
;
167
(
7
):
509
10
.
[PubMed]
0003-4819
4.
Schröder
FH
,
Hugosson
J
,
Roobol
MJ
,
Tammela
TL
,
Ciatto
S
,
Nelen
V
, et al.;
ERSPC Investigators
.
Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study
.
N Engl J Med
.
2009
Mar
;
360
(
13
):
1320
8
.
[PubMed]
0028-4793
5.
Andriole
GL
,
Crawford
ED
,
Grubb
RL
 3rd
,
Buys
SS
,
Chia
D
,
Church
TR
, et al.;
PLCO Project Team
.
Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial
.
N Engl J Med
.
2009
Mar
;
360
(
13
):
1310
9
.
[PubMed]
0028-4793
6.
Moyer
VA
;
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
.
Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement
.
Ann Intern Med
.
2012
Jul
;
157
(
2
):
120
34
.
[PubMed]
0003-4819
7.
Pinsky
PF
,
Prorok
PC
,
Kramer
BS
.
Prostate Cancer Screening - A Perspective on the Current State of the Evidence
.
N Engl J Med
.
2017
Mar
;
376
(
13
):
1285
9
.
[PubMed]
0028-4793
8.
Bibbins-Domingo
K
,
Grossman
DC
,
Curry
SJ
.
The US Preventive Services Task Force 2017 Draft Recommendation Statement on Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Invitation to Review and Comment
.
JAMA
.
2017
May
;
317
(
19
):
1949
50
.
[PubMed]
0098-7484
9.
Martin
RM
,
Donovan
JL
,
Turner
EL
,
Metcalfe
C
,
Young
GJ
,
Walsh
EI
, et al.;
CAP Trial Group
.
Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality: The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial
.
JAMA
.
2018
Mar
;
319
(
9
):
883
95
.
[PubMed]
0098-7484
10.
Fenton
JJ
,
Weyrich
MS
,
Durbin
S
,
Liu
Y
,
Bang
H
,
Melnikow
J
.
Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening for Prostate Cancer: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
.
JAMA
.
2018
May
;
319
(
18
):
1914
31
.
[PubMed]
0098-7484
11.
Pinsky
PF
,
Yu
K
,
Kramer
BS
,
Black
A
,
Buys
SS
,
Partridge
E
, et al.
Extended mortality results for ovarian cancer screening in the PLCO trial with median 15years follow-up
.
Gynecol Oncol
.
2016
Nov
;
143
(
2
):
270
5
.
[PubMed]
0090-8258
12.
Schröder
FH
,
Hugosson
J
,
Roobol
MJ
,
Tammela
TL
,
Zappa
M
,
Nelen
V
, et al.;
ERSPC Investigators
.
Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up
.
Lancet
.
2014
Dec
;
384
(
9959
):
2027
35
.
[PubMed]
0140-6736
13.
Osses
DF
,
Remmers
S
,
Schröder
FH
,
van der Kwast
T
,
Roobol
MJ
.
Results of Prostate Cancer Screening in a Unique Cohort at 19yr of Follow-up
.
Eur Urol
.
2019
Mar
;
75
(
3
):
374
7
.
[PubMed]
0302-2838
14.
Ito
K
.
Prostate cancer in Asian men
.
Nat Rev Urol
.
2014
Apr
;
11
(
4
):
197
212
.
[PubMed]
1759-4812
15.
Center
MM
,
Jemal
A
,
Lortet-Tieulent
J
,
Ward
E
,
Ferlay
J
,
Brawley
O
, et al.
International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates
.
Eur Urol
.
2012
Jun
;
61
(
6
):
1079
92
.
[PubMed]
0302-2838
16.
Rebbeck
TR
.
Prostate Cancer Genetics: Variation by Race, Ethnicity, and Geography
.
Semin Radiat Oncol
.
2017
Jan
;
27
(
1
):
3
10
.
[PubMed]
1053-4296
17.
Grossman
DC
,
Curry
SJ
,
Owens
DK
,
Bibbins-Domingo
K
,
Caughey
AB
,
Davidson
KW
, et al.;
US Preventive Services Task Force
.
Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
.
JAMA
.
2018
May
;
319
(
18
):
1901
13
.
[PubMed]
0098-7484
18.
Arnsrud Godtman
R
,
Holmberg
E
,
Lilja
H
,
Stranne
J
,
Hugosson
J
.
Opportunistic testing versus organized prostate-specific antigen screening: outcome after 18 years in the Göteborg randomized population-based prostate cancer screening trial
.
Eur Urol
.
2015
Sep
;
68
(
3
):
354
60
.
[PubMed]
0302-2838
19.
Auvinen
A
,
Moss
SM
,
Tammela
TL
,
Taari
K
,
Roobol
MJ
,
Schröder
FH
, et al.
Absolute Effect of Prostate Cancer Screening: Balance of Benefits and Harms by Center within the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening
.
Clin Cancer Res
.
2016
Jan
;
22
(
1
):
243
9
.
[PubMed]
1078-0432
20.
Bokhorst
LP
,
Bangma
CH
,
van Leenders
GJ
,
Lous
JJ
,
Moss
SM
,
Schröder
FH
, et al.
Prostate-specific antigen-based prostate cancer screening: reduction of prostate cancer mortality after correction for nonattendance and contamination in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
.
Eur Urol
.
2014
Feb
;
65
(
2
):
329
36
.
[PubMed]
0302-2838
21.
Grubb
RL
 3rd
,
Pinsky
PF
,
Greenlee
RT
,
Izmirlian
G
,
Miller
AB
,
Hickey
TP
, et al.
Prostate cancer screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian cancer screening trial: update on findings from the initial four rounds of screening in a randomized trial
.
BJU Int
.
2008
Dec
;
102
(
11
):
1524
30
.
[PubMed]
1464-4096
22.
Postma
R
,
Schröder
FH
,
van Leenders
GJ
,
Hoedemaeker
RF
,
Vis
AN
,
Roobol
MJ
, et al.
Cancer detection and cancer characteristics in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)—section Rotterdam. A comparison of two rounds of screening
.
Eur Urol
.
2007
Jul
;
52
(
1
):
89
97
.
[PubMed]
0302-2838
23.
Heijnsdijk
EA
,
Wever
EM
,
Auvinen
A
,
Hugosson
J
,
Ciatto
S
,
Nelen
V
, et al.
Quality-of-life effects of prostate-specific antigen screening
.
N Engl J Med
.
2012
Aug
;
367
(
7
):
595
605
.
[PubMed]
0028-4793
24.
Pataky
R
,
Gulati
R
,
Etzioni
R
,
Black
P
,
Chi
KN
,
Coldman
AJ
, et al.
Is prostate cancer screening cost-effective? A microsimulation model of prostate-specific antigen-based screening for British Columbia, Canada
.
Int J Cancer
.
2014
Aug
;
135
(
4
):
939
47
.
[PubMed]
0020-7136
25.
Roth
JA
,
Gulati
R
,
Gore
JL
,
Cooperberg
MR
,
Etzioni
R
.
Economic Analysis of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening and Selective Treatment Strategies
.
JAMA Oncol
.
2016
Jul
;
2
(
7
):
890
8
.
[PubMed]
2374-2437
26.
Heijnsdijk
EA
,
de Carvalho
TM
,
Auvinen
A
,
Zappa
M
,
Nelen
V
,
Kwiatkowski
M
, et al.
Cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening: a simulation study based on ERSPC data
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
.
2014
Dec
;
107
(
1
):
366
.
[PubMed]
1460-2105
27.
Shteynshlyuger
A
,
Andriole
GL
.
Cost-effectiveness of prostate specific antigen screening in the United States: extrapolating from the European study of screening for prostate cancer
.
J Urol
.
2011
Mar
;
185
(
3
):
828
32
.
[PubMed]
0022-5347
28.
Lansdorp-Vogelaar
I
,
Knudsen
AB
,
Brenner
H
.
Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening
.
Epidemiol Rev
.
2011
;
33
(
1
):
88
100
.
[PubMed]
0193-936X
29.
Ilic
D
,
Djulbegovic
M
,
Jung
JH
,
Hwang
EC
,
Zhou
Q
,
Cleves
A
, et al.
Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
BMJ
.
2018
Sep
;
362
:
k3519
.
[PubMed]
0959-8138
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.