In penile cancer, lymph node (LN) metastasis is the main known prognostic factor that affects survival. Inguinal sentinel LN (SLN) dissection (sLND) using radioactive marking is recommended by the European Association of Urology guidelines to evaluate the nodal status in clinically node-negative penile cancer (cN0; ≥pT1, G2). Dependence on radioisotopes limits the application of this procedure to small parts of the developed world, and imposes restrictions on hospital logistics. To overcome these issues, SLN visualization using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetometer-guided detection after intraprostatic injection of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION) has been successfully applied in prostate cancer. Here, we present the first results of magnetic sLND in penile cancer. After peritumoral SPION injection, MR SLN imaging and magnetometer-guided sLND were performed in one cN0 penile cancer patient. Another patient underwent magnetometer-guided sLND only. In the first case, 5 SLNs could be visualized on MRI and intraoperatively detected by magnetometer-guided sLND. In the second patient, 3 SLNs could be detected by magnetic sLND. Neither patient exhibited adverse events attributable to SPION-injection. In conclusion, SPION-guided SLN identification using MRI and a handheld magnetometer is feasible and could provide a radiation-free technique for SLN identification in penile cancer. For further clarification, a multicenter study should be carried out.

1.
Kroon BK, Horenblas S, Lont AP, Tanis PJ, Gallee MP, Nieweg OE. Patients with penile carcinoma benefit from immediate resection of clinically occult lymph node metastases. J Urol. 2005 Mar;173(3):816–9.
2.
Bevan-Thomas R, Slaton JW, Pettaway CA. Contemporary morbidity from lymphadenectomy for penile squamous cell carcinoma: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience. J Urol. 2002 Apr;167(4):1638–42.
3.
Protzel C, Alcaraz A, Horenblas S, Pizzocaro G, Zlotta A, Hakenberg OW. Lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of penile cancer. Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1075–88.
4.
Hakenberg OW, Compérat EM, Minhas S, Necchi A, Protzel C, Watkin N. Guidelines Associate: Robinson R. EAU Guidelines on Penile Cancer (Accessed March 24, 2019). Available from: http://www.uroweb.org/guideline/penile-cancer/.
5.
Douek M, Klaase J, Monypenny I, Kothari A, Zechmeister K, Brown D, et al.; SentiMAG Trialists Group. Sentinel node biopsy using a magnetic tracer versus standard technique: the SentiMAG Multicentre Trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Apr;21(4):1237–45.
6.
Winter A, Woenkhaus J, Wawroschek F. A novel method for intraoperative sentinel lymph node detection in prostate cancer patients using superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles and a handheld magnetometer: the initial clinical experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec;21(13):4390–6.
7.
Winter A, Chavan A, Wawroschek F. Magnetic resonance imaging of sentinel lymph nodes using intraprostatic injection of ­superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in prostate cancer patients: first-in-human results. Eur Urol. 2018 May;73(5):813–4.
8.
Winter A, Kowald T, Paulo TS, Goos P, Engels S, Gerullis H, et al. Magnetic resonance sentinel lymph node imaging and magnetometer-guided intraoperative detection in prostate cancer using superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018 Oct;13:6689–98.
9.
Lam W, Alnajjar HM, La-Touche S, Perry M, Sharma D, Corbishley C, et al. Dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: a prospective study of the long-term outcome of 500 inguinal basins assessed at a single institution. Eur Urol. 2013 Apr;63(4):657–63.
10.
Schubert T, Uphoff J, Henke RP, Wawroschek F, Winter A. Reliability of radioisotope-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in penile cancer: verification in consideration of the European guidelines. BMC Urol. 2015;28:15:98.
11.
Sadeghi R, Gholami H, Zakavi SR, Kakhki VR, Tabasi KT, Horenblas S. Accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy for inguinal lymph node staging of penile squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Urol. 2012 Jan;187(1):25–31.
You do not currently have access to this content.