Objective: The aim of this work was to select the best elements from previous scoring systems to restructure efficient predictive models for surgery type. Methods: Sixteen elements were selected from 7 systems (RENAL, PADUA, DAP, ZS, NephRO, ABC, and CI). They were divided into 6 categories (tumor max. size, exophytic/endophytic, correlation with collecting system or sinus, tumor location, contact situation with the parenchyma, invasion depth). Three elements, selected from 3 different categories, were integrated to establish a total of 320 new models. According to AUC rank, optimized models were developed, and these models were divided into 3 sections. An analysis of the distribution of the 6 categories was made to explore the predictive capacities of the models. Results: A total of 166 consecutive patients were included. Seventy-five patients underwent radical nephrectomy operations. The AUC of the 7 systems ranged from 0.81 to 0.844. Three optimized models (AUC 0.88) were developed to predict surgery type. These optimized models were composed of DAP (D), PADUA, (sinus), and ABC; DAP (D), RENAL (N), and ABC; NePhRO (O), PADUA (UCS), and ABC. Two categories (“exophytic/endophytic,” p < 0.001; “correlation with collecting system or sinus,” p = 0.001) were nonuniformly distributed. Conclusions: Seven systems held good predictive power for surgery type. Three optimized models were developed. “Correlation with collecting system or sinus” is a critical factor for predicting surgery type.

1.
Kutikov
A
,
Uzzo
RG
.
The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth
.
J Urol
.
2009
Sep
;
182
(
3
):
844
53
.
[PubMed]
0022-5347
2.
Ficarra
V
,
Novara
G
,
Secco
S
,
Macchi
V
,
Porzionato
A
,
De Caro
R
, et al.
Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery
.
Eur Urol
.
2009
Nov
;
56
(
5
):
786
93
.
[PubMed]
0302-2838
3.
Simmons
MN
,
Ching
CB
,
Samplaski
MK
,
Park
CH
,
Gill
IS
.
Kidney tumor location measurement using the C index method
.
J Urol
.
2010
May
;
183
(
5
):
1708
13
.
[PubMed]
0022-5347
4.
Simmons
MN
,
Hillyer
SP
,
Lee
BH
,
Fergany
AF
,
Kaouk
J
,
Campbell
SC
.
Diameter-axial-polar nephrometry: integration and optimization of R.E.N.A.L. and centrality index scoring systems
.
J Urol
.
2012
Aug
;
188
(
2
):
384
90
.
[PubMed]
0022-5347
5.
Spaliviero
M
,
Poon
BY
,
Karlo
CA
,
Guglielmetti
GB
,
Di Paolo
PL
,
Beluco Corradi
R
, et al.
An Arterial Based Complexity (ABC) Scoring System to Assess the Morbidity Profile of Partial Nephrectomy
.
Eur Urol
.
2016
Jan
;
69
(
1
):
72
9
.
[PubMed]
0302-2838
6.
Hakky
TS
,
Baumgarten
AS
,
Allen
B
,
Lin
HY
,
Ercole
CE
,
Sexton
WJ
, et al.
Zonal NePhRO scoring system: a superior renal tumor complexity classification model
.
Clin Genitourin Cancer
.
2014
Feb
;
12
(
1
):
e13
8
.
[PubMed]
1558-7673
7.
Davidiuk
AJ
,
Parker
AS
,
Thomas
CS
,
Leibovich
BC
,
Castle
EP
,
Heckman
MG
, et al.
Mayo adhesive probability score: an accurate image-based scoring system to predict adherent perinephric fat in partial nephrectomy
.
Eur Urol
.
2014
Dec
;
66
(
6
):
1165
71
.
[PubMed]
0302-2838
8.
Gupta
R
,
Tori
M
,
Babitz
SK
,
Tobert
CM
,
Anema
JG
,
Noyes
SL
, et al.
Comparison of RENAL, PADUA, CSA, and PAVP Nephrometry Scores in Predicting Functional Outcomes After Partial Nephrectomy
.
Urology
.
2019
Feb
;
124
:
160
7
.
[PubMed]
0090-4295
9.
Volpe
A
,
Terrone
C
.
Anatomic classification systems of renal tumors: new, useful tools in renal surgical oncology
.
Eur Urol
.
2011
Oct
;
60
(
4
):
731
3
.
[PubMed]
0302-2838
10.
Tobert
CM
,
Shoemaker
A
,
Kahnoski
RJ
,
Lane
BR
.
Critical appraisal of first-generation renal tumor complexity scoring systems: creation of a second-generation model of tumor complexity
.
Urol Oncol
.
2015
Apr
;
33
(
4
):
167.e1
6
.
[PubMed]
1078-1439
11.
Zhou
L
,
Guo
J
,
Wang
H
,
Wang
G
.
The Zhongshan score: a novel and simple anatomic classification system to predict perioperative outcomes of nephron-sparing surgery
.
Medicine (Baltimore)
.
2015
Feb
;
94
(
5
):
e506
.
[PubMed]
0025-7974
12.
Tay
MH
,
Thamboo
TP
,
Wu
FM
,
Zhaojin
C
,
Choo
TB
,
Ramaan
L
, et al.
High R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry scores are associated with pathologic upstaging of clinical T1 renal-cell carcinomas in radical nephrectomy specimens: implications for nephron-sparing surgery. Journal of endourology / Endourological Society.
2014
;28(9):1138-42.
13.
Chen
SH
,
Wu
YP
,
Li
XD
,
Lin
T
,
Guo
QY
,
Chen
YH
, et al.
R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score: A Preoperative Risk Factor Predicting the Fuhrman Grade of Clear-Cell Renal Carcinoma
.
J Cancer
.
2017
Oct
;
8
(
18
):
3725
32
.
[PubMed]
0378-2360
14.
Matsumoto
R
,
Abe
T
,
Shinohara
N
,
Murai
S
,
Maruyama
S
,
Tsuchiya
K
, et al.
RENAL nephrometry score is a predictive factor for the annual growth rate of renal mass.
International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.
2014
;21(6):549-52.
15.
Bylund
JR
,
Qiong
H
,
Crispen
PL
,
Venkatesh
R
,
Strup
SE
.
Association of clinical and radiographic features with perinephric "sticky" fat.
Journal of endourology / Endourological Society.
2013
;27(3):370-3.
16.
Maxwell
AW
,
Baird
GL
,
Iannuccilli
JD
,
Mayo-Smith
WW
,
Dupuy
DE
.
Renal Cell Carcinoma: Comparison of RENAL Nephrometry and PADUA Scores with Maximum Tumor Diameter for Prediction of Local Recurrence after Thermal Ablation
.
Radiology
.
2017
May
;
283
(
2
):
590
7
.
[PubMed]
0033-8419
17.
Benadiba
S
,
Verin
AL
,
Pignot
G
,
Bessede
T
,
Drai
J
,
Bahi
R
, et al.
Are urologists and radiologists equally effective in determining the RENAL Nephrometry score?
Ann Surg Oncol
.
2015
May
;
22
(
5
):
1618
24
.
[PubMed]
1068-9265
18.
Gu
L
,
Ma
X
,
Li
H
,
Yao
Y
,
Xie
Y
,
Chen
L
, et al.
External validation of the Arterial Based Complexity (ABC) scoring system in renal tumors treated by minimally invasive partial nephrectomy
.
J Surg Oncol
.
2017
Sep
;
116
(
4
):
507
14
.
[PubMed]
0022-4790
19.
Roscigno
M
,
Ceresoli
F
,
Naspro
R
,
Montorsi
F
,
Bertini
R
,
Da Pozzo
LF
.
Predictive accuracy of nephrometric scores can be improved by adding clinical patient characteristics: a novel algorithm combining anatomic tumour complexity, body mass index, and Charlson comorbidity index to depict perioperative complications after nephron-sparing surgery
.
Eur Urol
.
2014
Jan
;
65
(
1
):
259
62
.
[PubMed]
0302-2838
20.
Kriegmair
MC
,
Mandel
P
,
Moses
A
,
Lenk
J
,
Rothamel
M
,
Budjan
J
, et al.
Defining Renal Masses: Comprehensive Comparison of RENAL, PADUA, NePhRO, and C-Index Score
.
Clin Genitourin Cancer
.
2017
Apr
;
15
(
2
):
248
255.e1
.
[PubMed]
1558-7673
21.
Ljungberg
B
,
Albiges
L
,
Abu-Ghanem
Y
,
Bensalah
K
,
Dabestani
S
,
Fernández-Pello
S
, et al.
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update
.
Eur Urol
.
2019
May
;
75
(
5
):
799
810
.
[PubMed]
0302-2838
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.