Introduction: Focal therapy (FT) by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an emerging option for localized prostate cancer (PC). Due to the lack of long-term data, a close monitoring after FT is essential, but there are still uncertainties about the optimal follow-up regimen. Here we report on a series of FT-HIFU patients with the focus on oncological short-term outcome and the value of postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: We included 21 patients treated by FT-HIFU using the Focal One® device (EDAP TMS, France) between November 2015 and May 2018. PC localization was assessed by preoperative multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and transrectal ultrasound-guided targeted and systematic biopsy. Oncological follow-up included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) development, mpMRI, control biopsies (targeted and systematic) of the treated and untreated areas and salvage treatment rate. Control mpMRI and control biopsy were performed after 6–12 months. Results: 15 patients (71.4%) were managed by focal ablation of a solitary lesion, while 6 patients (28.6%) underwent zonal tumor ablation. All patients underwent control mpMRI and biopsy. After a mean follow-up period of 11.7 months, cancer relapse was detected in 8 patients (38.1%), with 4 patients (19%) having infield recurrence. Postoperative mpMRI revealed 3 out of 4 infield PC relapses but missed 5 out of 7 outfield relapses. Clinically significant cancer recurrence was present in 1 patient (4.8%), which was missed by mpMRI. Posttreatment mpMRI had a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 62.5, 92.3, 83.3 and 80.0%, respectively, for overall relapse detection based on patient level. Only 1 of the 8 recurrences was suspected based on PSA progression. 4 of the 8 patients with PC relapse (19%) underwent salvage therapy (2 patients by radical prostatectomy, 2 patients by salvage FT-HIFU). Conclusion: Postoperative mpMRI might play a valuable role during follow-up after focal HIFU therapy, particularly in terms of infield relapse detection. Irrespective of mpMRI results, the repeat biopsy regimen should incorporate systematic biopsy including cores of the treated and untreated prostate areas.

Keywords:
Prostate cancer, Focal therapy, High-intensity focused ultrasound, Magnetic resonance imaging
1.
Valerio M, Ahmed HU, Emberton M, Lawrentschuk N, Lazzeri M, Montironi R, et al. The role of focal therapy in the management of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2014 Oct;66(4):732–51.
2.
Wilt TJ, Jones KM, Barry MJ, Andriole GL, Culkin D, Wheeler T, et al. Follow-up of Prostatectomy versus Observation for Early Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul;377(2):132–42.
3.
Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P, et al.; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct;375(15):1415–24.
4.
Lindner U, Trachtenberg J, Lawrentschuk N. Focal therapy in prostate cancer: modalities, findings and future considerations. Nat Rev Urol. 2010 Oct;7(10):562–71.
5.
Eggener S, Salomon G, Scardino PT, De la Rosette J, Polascik TJ, Brewster S. Focal therapy for prostate cancer: possibilities and limitations. Eur Urol. 2010 Jul;58(1):57–64.
6.
Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618–29.
7.
van den Bos W, Muller BG, Ahmed H, Bangma CH, Barret E, Crouzet S, et al. Focal therapy in prostate cancer: international multidisciplinary consensus on trial design. Eur Urol. 2014 Jun;65(6):1078–83.
8.
Mouraviev V, Mayes JM, Sun L, Madden JF, Moul JW, Polascik TJ. Prostate cancer laterality as a rationale of focal ablative therapy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Cancer. 2007 Aug;110(4):906–10.
9.
Nevoux P, Ouzzane A, Ahmed HU, Emberton M, Montironi R, Presti JC Jr, et al. Quantitative tissue analyses of prostate cancer foci in an unselected cystoprostatectomy series. BJU Int. 2012 Aug;110(4):517–23.
10.
Ahmed HU. The index lesion and the origin of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct;361(17):1704–6.
11.
Kasivisvanathan V, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. Focal therapy for prostate cancer: rationale and treatment opportunities. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2013 Aug;25(8):461–73.
12.
Ganzer R, Fritsche HM, Brandtner A, Bründl J, Koch D, Wieland WF, et al. Fourteen-year oncological and functional outcomes of high-intensity focused ultrasound in localized prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(3):322–9.
13.
Chaussy CG, Thüroff S. High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Review. J Endourol. 2017 Apr;31(S1):S30–7.
14.
Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Haider MA, Macura KJ, et al. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16–40.
15.
Ahmed HU, Dickinson L, Charman S, Weir S, McCartan N, Hindley RG, et al. Focal Ablation Targeted to the Index Lesion in Multifocal Localised Prostate Cancer: a Prospective Development Study. Eur Urol. 2015 Dec;68(6):927–36.
16.
Feijoo ER, Sivaraman A, Barret E, Sanchez-Salas R, Galiano M, Rozet F, et al. Focal High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Targeted Hemiablation for Unilateral Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Evaluation of Oncologic and Functional Outcomes. Eur Urol. 2016 Feb;69(2):214–20.
17.
Rischmann P, Gelet A, Riche B, Villers A, Pasticier G, Bondil P, et al. Focal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound of Unilateral Localized Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Multicentric Hemiablation Study of 111 Patients. Eur Urol. 2017 Feb;71(2):267–73.
18.
Ganzer R, Hadaschik B, Pahernik S, Koch D, Baumunk D, Kuru T, et al. Prospective Multicenter Phase II Study on Focal Therapy (Hemiablation) of the Prostate with High Intensity Focused Ultrasound. J Urol. 2018 Apr;199(4):983–9.
19.
Donaldson IA, Alonzi R, Barratt D, Barret E, Berge V, Bott S, et al. Focal therapy: patients, interventions, and outcomes–a report from a consensus meeting. Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):771–7.
20.
Muto S, Yoshii T, Saito K, Kamiyama Y, Ide H, Horie S. Focal therapy with high-intensity-focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar;38(3):192–9.
21.
Ahmed HU, Freeman A, Kirkham A, Sahu M, Scott R, Allen C, et al. Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a phase I/II trial. J Urol. 2011 Apr;185(4):1246–54.
22.
El Fegoun AB, Barret E, Prapotnich D, Soon S, Cathelineau X, Rozet F, et al. Focal therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer in the elderly. A feasibility study with 10 years follow-up. Int Braz J Urol. 2011 Mar-Apr;37(2):213–9.
23.
Ahmed HU, Hindley RG, Dickinson L, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Sahu M, et al. Focal therapy for localised unifocal and multifocal prostate cancer: a prospective development study. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(6):622–32.
24.
Van Velthoven R, Aoun F, Limani K, Narahari K, Lemort M, Peltier A. Primary Zonal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Prostate Cancer: Results of a Prospective Phase IIa Feasibility Study. Prostate Cancer. 2014;2014:756189.
25.
von Hardenberg J, Westhoff N, Baumunk D, Hausmann D, Martini T, Marx A, Porubsky S, Schostak M, Michel MS, Ritter M: Prostate cancer treatment by the latest focal HIFU device with MRI/TRUS-fusion control biopsies: A prospective evaluation. Urol Oncol 2018;36:401 e401-401.e409.
26.
Stabile A, Orczyk C, Hosking-Jervis F, Giganti F, Arya M, Hindley RG, et al. Medium-term oncological outcomes in a large cohort of men treated with either focal or hemi-ablation using high-intensity focused ultrasonography for primary localized prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2019, Epub ahead of print.
27.
Guillaumier S, Peters M, Arya M, Afzal N, Charman S, Dudderidge T, et al. A Multicentre Study of 5-year Outcomes Following Focal Therapy in Treating Clinically Significant Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):422–9.
28.
Kirkham AP, Emberton M, Hoh IM, Illing RO, Freeman AA, Allen C. MR imaging of prostate after treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Radiology. 2008 Mar;246(3):833–44.
29.
Rouvière O, Lyonnet D, Raudrant A, Colin-Pangaud C, Chapelon JY, Bouvier R, et al. MRI appearance of prostate following transrectal HIFU ablation of localized cancer. Eur Urol. 2001 Sep;40(3):265–74.
30.
Rouvière O, Girouin N, Glas L, Ben Cheikh A, Gelet A, Mège-Lechevallier F, et al. Prostate cancer transrectal HIFU ablation: detection of local recurrences using T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol. 2010 Jan;20(1):48–55.
31.
Drost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, et al. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr;4:CD012663.
32.
Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, et al.; PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017 Feb;389(10071):815–22.
33.
Dickinson L, Ahmed HU, Hindley RG, McCartan N, Freeman A, Allen C, et al. Prostate-specific antigen vs. magnetic resonance imaging parameters for assessing oncological outcomes after high intensity-focused ultrasound focal therapy for localized prostate cancer. Urol Oncol. 2017 Jan;35(1):30.e9–15.
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
2019
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.