Introduction: No wound to the patients is the pursuit of surgeons. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) are minimally invasive modalities for treating horseshoe kidney (HSK) stone <2 cm. We aimed to review the outcomes and complications of comparing SWL and URS in HSK stone. Methods: The literature was reviewed in the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library up to March 1, 2018. Only 4 articles were available for analysis. Inclusion criteria were all English language articles reporting on the comparison between SWL and URS. Results: URS tends to be performed in a relatively heavier stone burden. The higher initial stone-free rate and success rate were demonstrated for URS than for SWL (p < 0.00001, p = 0.02, respectively). The less retreatment rate was found in URS than SWL (p = 0.04). There was no difference in minor complications in the 2 groups (p = 0.57). Renal colic episodes were more likely to be observed in the SWL group (p = 0.02). There were no major complications found in the review. Conclusion: For a stone <2 cm in HSK, both SWL and URS are safe treatment modalities. URS alone is a more feasible and sufficient option for stone in HSK <2 cm than SWL with possibilities of a second session.

1.
Ishii H, Rai B, Traxer O, Kata SG, Somani BK. Outcome of ureteroscopy for stone disease in patients with horseshoe kidney: review of world literature.
Urol Ann
. 2015 Oct-Dec;7(4):470–4.
2.
Yohannes P, Smith AD. The endourological management of complications associated with horseshoe kidney.
J Urol
. 2002 Jul;168(1):5–8.
3.
Yu X, Peng E, Wang S, Ye Z. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy accessed by svof two-step dilation with ultrasound-guided prone position puncture for 11 507 patients.
J Urol
. 2017;197(4S):e924.
4.
Jiang K, Tang K, Xu H, Chen H, Chen Z. Retroperitoneoscopy Technique-Assisted Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Complexity Horseshoe Kidney with Renal Stones.
Urol Int
. 2016;97(3):285–91.
5.
Viola D, Anagnostou T, Thompson TJ, Smith G, Moussa SA, Tolley DA. Sixteen years of experience with stone management in horseshoe kidneys.
Urol Int
. 2007;78(3):214–8.
6.
Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.
Eur Urol
. 2016 Mar;69(3):475–82.
7.
Singh AG, Chhabra JS, Sabnis R, Ganpule A, Jairath A, Shah D, et al. Role of flexible uretero-renoscopy in management of renal calculi in anomalous kidneys: single-center experience.
World J Urol
. 2017 Feb;35(2):319–24.
8.
Ding J, Huang Y, Gu S, Chen Y, Peng J, Bai Q, et al. Flexible Ureteroscopic Management of Horseshoe Kidney Renal Calculi.
Int Braz J Urol
. 2015 Jul-Aug;41(4):683–9.
9.
Ugurlu M. Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with anomalous kidneys: A single center experience.
J Endourol
. 2012;26:A150.
10.
Ray AA, Ghiculete D, D’A Honey RJ, Pace KT. Shockwave lithotripsy in patients with horseshoe kidney: determinants of success.
J Endourol
. 2011 Mar;25(3):487–93.
11.
Torrecilla Ortíz C, Ponce Campuzano A, Contreras García J, Marco Pérez LM, -Colom Feixas S, Vigués Juliá F, et al. -[Treatment of lithiasis in horseshoe kidney with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy].
Actas Urol Esp
. 2001 Jan;25(1):50–4.
12.
Vandeursen H, Baert L. Electromagnetic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for calculi in horseshoe kidneys.
J Urol
. 1992 Sep;148(3 Pt 2):1120–2.
13.
Symons SJ, Ramachandran A, Kurien A, Baiysha R, Desai MR. Urolithiasis in the horseshoe kidney: a single-centre experience.
BJU Int
. 2008 Dec;102(11):1676–80.
14.
Gokce MI, Tokatli Z, Suer E, Hajiyev P, Akinci A, Esen B. Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for treatment of stone disease in horseshoe kidney patients.
Int Braz J Urol
. 2016 Jan-Feb;42(1):96–100.
15.
Ding J, Zhang Y, Cao Q, Huang T, Xu W, Huang K, et al. Tailored minimally invasive management of complex calculi in horseshoe kidney.
J XRay Sci Technol
. 2015;23(5):601–10.
16.
Blackburne AT, Rivera ME, Gettman MT, Patterson DE, Krambeck AE. Endoscopic Management of Urolithiasis in the Horseshoe Kidney.
Urology
. 2016 Apr;90:45–9.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.